What good anti-radar? Reviews, reviews and prices

Radar detectors have long been known to Russian motorists. The device for a few years has passed a serious modernization path and today is almost a multifunctional complex with a rich set of assistants. So, if in the choice of the first models the buyer was mainly oriented to the "long range" of the device, today this parameter is practically abolished, and the quality of signal processing and ergonomic advantages came to the fore.

Also the question of what good anti-radar can be found in today's car market is being decided on the price criterion. Of course, for a lot of money you can find high-quality equipment, but not every driver can afford it.

General information on anti-radars

The main function of any radar detector is to alert the user to the approaching point of fixing the traffic violation. If before such models were oriented on the signals of direct approximation to the sources of fixation, the modern antiradar with GPS works on the principle of navigational orientation. That is, its effectiveness in terms of detecting the GIBDD fixing device is determined by the quality of interaction with satellite systems. In addition, the user service of the detector in terms of updating geolocation cards is of no small importance.

Despite the outwardly simple function, the determination of the value of a specific radar model is based on a variety of criteria. For example, to find out which good anti-radars, and which are ineffective, will help and analyze the capabilities of the equipment to identify those or other signals from the fact-finding stations of speeding mode excess.

Basic characteristics of radar detectors

The primary property that determines the overall quality of the device is the detection distance of the signal. The fact is that the database from the navigator gives only a map of labels, but not always it corresponds to the real state of affairs. Distance range in modern models varies from 200 to 500 m on average. The specific distance on which different models of radar detectors work depends on many parameters. It is affected both by the type of processor installed in the stuffing, and the radio sensors, but mainly depends on the type of the radar itself. Most models are guided by the detection of "Shooter" in various modifications. It can be said that the most effective devices are able to catch radiation locks at long distances of about 500 m.

Reviews of the models "Cobra"

Under the brand "Cobra" technological models are produced, capable of working with virtually all types of radars, including radar ones. As noted by users, in classical designs, the anti-radar "Cobra" is able to fix the "trap" after 400-500 m, but in some cases there is still a dependence on the satellite database tagging.

One of the most popular and successful modifications is the RU 955CT. Users indicate the ability of the model to detect with some degree of accuracy all versions of short-pulse radars. There is also a convenience in terms of setting the device. For example, to save the user from unnecessary trouble, the developers have provided special modes of operation. In addition, the anti-radar "Cobra" is equipped with the option of eliminating false positives. And if in competitive modifications the filtering in most cases gives a low percentage of accuracy, then in the model RU 955CT the coefficient is sufficiently optimized.

Comments about Storm models

Korean manufacturer Storm is also one of the leading representatives of the segment of automotive radio equipment. Most models come with a GPS module, which, however, can not always be guessed without an inspection of the instructions. Special interest among users is the modification STR-9520EX Storm. Antiradar in this performance allows you to adjust the speed, but the range may vary depending on traffic conditions, which causes critical reviews. But to ergonomic advantages it is possible to carry a remarkably distinct and simple updating of a DB through an official site.

In general, the owners of this device highly appreciate the basic function of detecting radars. On the other hand, the grayness of the design solution is often noted, which is often the fault of the Storm models. Anti-radar from Korean developers, moreover, is not cheap, but for optimal performance indicators you always have to overpay.

Model Reviews Sho-Me

Another Korean developer, who willingly delivers to the market is not cheap devices. In this case, it is worth considering a budget model, which is quite consistent with its performance properties to some premium competitors. This is the G800 anti-radar, among the pluses of which users note "omnivorous", a wide range of settings and a well-executed screen. The only problem is that there are misfires with lasers. To minimize omissions, experienced drivers recommend carefully working with a comparison of vehicle speed and settings for database limits.

Reviews of Crunch models

The Crunch brand is less well-known, but it has also distinguished itself by producing a good 221B STR solution. The practice of operating the model shows that the device confidently works with cameras and radars covering the ranges K, X and Ka. Many also note the effectiveness of the system, which protects from detection.

If we talk about weak spots, the Crunch radar in the modification 221B STR is poorly optimized for clipping of false signals. However, with proper handling of settings for driving modes in the city and on the road, this percentage can be significantly reduced.

When choosing this model, one should take into account one more nuance, which can go both in pluses and minuses. The fact that the anti-radar Crunch gives the user a wide range of individual adjustments. This concerns the operation of both the display and the direct detection capabilities of radar sockets. Of course, an inexperienced user can turn to the optimal factory settings or use automatic settings, but this is the case when system assistants do not guarantee maximum efficiency of the device.

Reviews of models Whistler

Philippine equipment is represented on the domestic market widely, and there are quite reasonable grounds for this. Experienced car owners recommend not to save and purchase a Whistler radar in premium versions. This product justifies the price tags from 10 thousand rubles.

In particular, in this segment, the Pro-99ST model was particularly bright. According to the owners, the device is good in many respects. As an example, the effectiveness in detecting radial stations and pleasant little things in the form of a solid design and ergonomically thought out menu lead also.

As for the shortcomings, then they are present. The most annoying for many users was the inconvenient database update system. It turns out that the Whistler radar detector is potentially located to ensure high detection results, but the process of bookmarking information causes difficulties. However, the experience of many motorists shows that after a certain period of operation and to solve this shortcoming, you can adapt.

What should be the optional equipment?

Manufacturers seek to offer small-sized devices, which at the same time are distinguished by simple control. Accordingly, the introduction of additional functions is almost not practiced. This privilege, rather, is assigned to navigation devices.

Nevertheless, premium models in the interest of improving competitive qualities still receive new technological improvements. Another thing is that they are all grounded on improving the quality of basic functions. So, in the question of which good anti-radar can be paid attention from the point of view of optional equipment, it is important to take into account the communication capabilities and the widening range of the device. For the technological communication is responsible for the Bluetooth-module, through which the user can update directly through the smartphone.

As for extending coverage of the device, new expensive models in addition receive so-called horn antennas. With such equipment, the radar detector for the car increases the range and adds to the sensitivity indicators, which, in turn, qualitatively affects the reduction of false positives.

How to choose the best radar detector?

The decisive feature of the detector is the ability to work with different types of radars. A high accuracy of detection of the entire spectrum of fasteners of speed violations, close to 100 percent, today can not provide any device for mass distribution. Therefore, you should immediately focus on specific needs. The main division according to this criterion takes place according to modern radial stations.

Therefore, if financial possibilities permit, then it is possible to acquire models fixing the "beam" even with 200 m. At great distances, even premium devices are unstable. Also, the optimal anti-radar for a car must meet the requirements for ergonomics. It is desirable to focus on the compactness of dimensions, ease of updating the database, as well as the quality of the technical basis, which is determined by the novelty of the processor.

Price issue

As the review has shown, even budget devices can detect the most common radar in Russia of the traffic police. And the model G800 from the company Sho-Me does it with enviable accuracy and costs only 4,5-5 thousand rubles. Solving the question of what good anti-radar can be paid attention in higher segments, it is worth to prepare for the amounts of 10-15 thousand. For this money, the device must efficiently process the main radar signals, cope with beam locks, and also contain modern technological improvements.

Conclusion

In parallel with the development of radar detectors, the arsenal of traffic police officers is being improved. A wide variety of stations fixing speed violations complicates the work of manufacturers of protective devices. But the fact that the principle of the action of all possible "Shooter" remains unified, makes the situation not hopeless.

In modern versions, high-quality anti-radar with GPS provides the function of detecting target equipment with varying degrees of accuracy. Unfortunately, it is rather difficult to calculate in advance what device will be effective in specific operating conditions. For this reason, many motorists can only rely on more obvious selection criteria, including ergonomics, reliability, functionality and, of course, cost.