What are reviews and what are the rules for their compilation?

What are reviews? This genre in journalism, which includes the analysis of literary (artistic, cinematographic, theatrical) work in writing, contains a review and critical reviewer. The task of the author of the review includes an objective description of the merits and demerits of the work being examined, its style, the skill of the writer or the director in depicting the characters. To justify their point of view, citations are given. Characterized by a small amount and conciseness.

Description of the review

To understand what a review is and how to write it, you need to know about the main characteristics of this genre:

1. The review should contain an in-depth analysis of the work and its evaluation.
2. Depending on the purpose of writing, various styles can be used: publicistic, scientific-popular or scientific.
3. The type of speech is reasoning.
4. The review is written according to a certain plan in a reserved tone, in contrast to the recall, which can be made in free form.

There are several basic principles of peer review:

1. This genre is characterized by an in-depth analysis of the text, argumentation with reference to the content of the work, brief conclusions about its main idea.
2. The quality of the analysis depends on the level and abilities of the reviewer.
3. The reviewer should express his thoughts rationally and logically, without using emotionally colored remarks.
4. Advantages of the author of the review are: erudition, high level of preparation, language culture, analytical thinking.

Plan of writing a review

What should the review look like? A sample writing or work plan should contain:

1. Obligatory introduction with the data of the reviewed work: who is the creator, what issue is it dedicated to, why this topic is relevant. It is important to correctly determine the purpose and tasks that the author sets himself.
2. In the main part, questions are raised about what is at the center of the work, what is the focus on. The reviewer assesses the content and form of the artistic text.
3. Next, you should go on to describe the shortcomings of the work, to reveal the defects of its author.
4. In conclusion, a general analysis of the work is given, the main conclusions are drawn.

What is a review of the book?

Trying to find an answer to the question about what the review of the book differs from other species, it is necessary to determine the main purpose of writing such works. For literary work critical and objective evaluation is very important, especially for novelties, which are not yet known to the average reader. It is the reviews that allow you to evaluate the book before buying. They can be in-house (written for the editor) or external (appeared after the publication). Do not confuse these works with reviews, where there is only a personal attitude to the work.

There are several typical mistakes in writing a book review:

1. Substitution analysis of the story of his brief retelling.
2. Absence of arguments and citations in the evaluation of work.
3. Overloading with minor details to the detriment of the main content.
4. Emphasis on the ideological features, not the aesthetics of the text.

When evaluating a work of art, one should also pay attention to the persuasiveness and novelty of the problematics of the text. It is important that there is a place in the work for discussion of human values and principles of building a society.

What is a review of the film?

To write a review of the cinematographic work, it is reviewed at least twice. After the first viewing on paper, impressions from the script, the acting and special effects are recorded. It is better to start working right away, with fresh sensations. Then you need to look for information about the director, the performers of the main roles, their main achievements and awards.

If it's not a question of the premiere, you can refer to other reviews, compare them among themselves. This will allow you to write an interesting and original text without repeating what has already been said. The second viewing is needed to order your sensations and give an objective assessment to the cinematographic work. Separately it is worth mentioning the musical accompaniment of the film and sharing information about the authors of the soundtrack.

Plan a review of the film

In order to understand what the reviews of cinematographic works are and how best to write them, you need to prepare a plan in advance with the following points:

1. A summary of the film.
2. Impressions of the reviewer from viewing.
3. Evaluation of acting skills, character development, director's and camera work.
4. Recommendations that allow readers to understand whether to watch this film.

A few more explanations, what are reviews and what tasks they should perform: the author should describe the pros and cons of the picture, point out the symbolism of those or other episodes that the ordinary viewer is difficult to understand independently. Separately, you can write about landscapes and interiors, against which events occur, about the work of the costumer and accuracy in the transfer of details, especially if the cinema is historical.

Before you publish your work, it is desirable to read it 1-2 times out loud, with interruptions of 20-30 minutes, which will make it possible to avoid many mistakes and correct the text style. These small recommendations will help future authors in understanding what reviews are and will make a memorable and useful analysis of a literary or cinematic work.