Fructose instead of sugar: the choice is good only for diabetics

In the shops there are whole sections for diabetics, where a large assortment of products are presented on fructose. There are marmalade, chocolate, waffles, sweets made with fructose. Often those who wish to lose weight often fall into these sections. They hope that if fructose appears in the diet instead of sugar, the numbers on the scales will falter and go down. But is it?

We will answer at once - fructose is not a panacea in the fight for a good figure. Rather, it even hurts. And for that there are reasons, first of all, these are the features of the exchange of this connection.

Fructose does not cause a significant increase in insulin production. Of course, this is a positive property, because the background, in which insulin is elevated, causes the body to postpone fats. But in the liver, our fructose will be converted into alcohol glycerol, which is the basis for the synthesis of fats in the human body. If we were eating the same fructose, perhaps a big problem would not have arisen, but those who lose weight do not switch to the same fruits or juices in most cases. And insulin is produced not only as a reaction to sugar, but also to proteins (protein can not be rejected!). They ate you meat, then they ate fruit, and the body went into the accumulation regime, and if the caloric content is reduced, as is often the case with losing weight, then he will try to postpone the maximum fat, which is perfectly synthesized on the glycerol formed in the liver. So fructose instead of sugar in biochemical terms - a disadvantageous solution.

In addition, do not forget that the caloric content of fructose is the same as that of glucose. Therefore, you can not save calories on it. Of course, fructose in diabetes is a good alternative to sugar, because it gives energy and taste is sweeter. But in fact very many diabetics do not imagine a full life without a sweet. Sweets with fructose are inexpensive, and on other substitutes in our grocery stores is not enough. In addition, the intake of fructose by diabetics does not once again provoke an insulin system, which certainly is a very weighty argument in favor of fructose.

Another problem with the consumption of this substance is that it is not absorbed by the brain. The brain asks for glucose, and at the termination of its admission, many begin headaches, aggravated from physical exertion. Fructose instead of sugar will not give the brain the right level of nutrients in the blood, which will immediately affect your health. In an attempt to synthesize glucose, the body will begin to destroy muscle tissue. And this is the direct way to obesity in the future, because muscles consume a lot of energy. So it's better not to provoke your body. Of course, with diabetes mellitus , the sick do not have many alternatives, and fructose is often chosen. The use and harm of this substance for diabetics have been studied for a long time. And with diabetes, the use of this compound is appropriate, for weight loss - no.

Also fructose does not cause a sense of satiety. Probably, many of the readers know that after eating an apple on an empty stomach, you want more. Only mechanical filling of the stomach volume with other apples helps to overcome hunger, but not for long. The hunger remains biochemically. And it's not just about the low caloric content of apples, it's also because leptin, a substance that promotes a feeling of satiation, is not properly produced.

Fructose instead of sugar - is this a reasonable preference? As we see from the above, this is not a very reasonable choice. Of course, this does not mean that you need to give up fruit and freshly squeezed juices, but do not put fructose in tea instead of banal sugar. After all, a lot of a large amount of this substance can cause indigestion. Not everyone is able to absorb fructose without problems. So if you are not diabetic, but just want to reduce weight, it is better to consult other sugar substitutes.