A ceding sentence: examples

In complex sentences, in addition to the main, there must be an additional clause. This second dependent part can play different roles. For example, there is a subordinate concessionary. The features of such proposals will be discussed in this article.

Complex sentences with subordinate assignments

The Russian language is multifold and expressive. To enhance or accentuate the description of certain events or phenomena, a complex sentence with an auxiliary concessionary is often used. Usually it contains an indication of a certain condition that might hinder the execution of anything described in the main part, but in spite of this, the action is completed, accomplished or can occur. That is, the subordinate concessionary is a speech construct containing a non-triggered cause that could interfere with the action, but did not affect it. You should also know that it is part of a complex sentence, and always acts as an addict. For example: "Despite the fact that many countries have developed a social program to help the poor, beggars continue to beg for alms in the transitions." The main part - "poor children continue to beg in the crossings." The concession is contained in the proposal "despite the fact that many countries have developed a social assistance program for the indigent." This part is dependent, since separately without the main can not exist - the thought is not finished and requires disclosure.

If you turn both parts of the compound sentence into simple equivalent units of speech, you get the following: "In many states, a social program for helping the poor has been developed. Beggar children continue to beg in the crossings. " In principle, the meaning of the statement is preserved, but both proposals are contradictory to each other, which creates some difficulty in understanding the main idea of the author's statement. It is for the most successful understanding of the meaning, for greater expressiveness and the creation of a vivid image in speech, that compound sentences with subordinate concessions are used. Thanks to such constructions, the main idea of the statement becomes more emotional and colorful.

Questions to which the subordinate concession is responsible

In the process of syntactic analysis of complex sentences, it is necessary to determine the relationship between its parts. Therefore it is very important to remember that subordinate clauses give answers to questions in spite of what? No matter what? Despite what? and some others. For example: "Contrary to popular belief about the bloodthirstiness of tigers, practice proves otherwise: these animals are capable of being sweet, affectionate and obedient, like domestic cats."

Consider the connection: "Practice proves otherwise (contrary to what?) In spite of the popular opinion about the bloodthirstiness of tigers." There is a concessionary concessionary. In the sentence, it stands in front of the main part, separated by a comma. You should also know that the subordinate concessionary refers to all the main things. With dependent proposals of a different kind, the situation is different. For example, the prerogatives and time relate only to the predicate main part, and the attributive parts refer to the noun, pronoun or word of another part of speech that performs the function of a noun.

Unions for the connection of parts in constructions of the type considered

The subordinate concedes to the main concession with the help of the following unions: despite the fact that, despite the fact that, despite the fact that despite the fact that, let it be, though, though. Such a construction is often encountered in speech. Help consider the proposal of the subordinate conclusive examples:

1. Granted that she was beautiful and clever, nobody married a girl.

2. Let it rain on the street, children do not stay locked up!

3. I'll fire you, regardless of who the headmaster of the school is your spouse!

4. Despite the rapidly deteriorating eyesight, Valentin did not stop his experiments.

5. Although the spring was already in full swing, our chicken did not want to sit down on eggs.

6. Though the wind knocks down from the feet, let the snow fall asleep, it's still necessary to go to work.

The appearance in the design of yet another union of "buts"

Sometimes in the main sentence, in addition to the already existing alliance, the word "but" appears in the subordinate concessive. The design can exist in both cases. However, if you have a "but" put punctuation is easier, because everyone knows that before this union is always a comma. For comparison, you can give examples similar to those used above: "Although the wind knocked down the feet, let the snow fall asleep, but it's still necessary to go to work" or "Let it rain on the street, but the kids are not locked up in the streets".

For self-testing, a hint based on the method of constructing compound sentences with subordinate concessions is proposed. It says: if the main part can be substituted union "but" without loss of meaning, then you need to put a comma before this union. To define this construction follows as a complex subordinate clause with an additional clause.

We should dwell in more detail on the spelling of the unions "in spite of" and "despite", as well as list complex unions, which include these words.

Split and split spelling

If the sentence with the subordinate concessionary includes the words "regardless" and "despite", it is necessary to know that they, the name of the gerundive form, are written with the particle "not" in one. For comparison: "Tanya washed the dishes, not looking in the direction of Valentine." "Not looking" in this case is a member of the sentence (circumstance), therefore it is spelled separately. "Despite the poor state of health, Tanya washed the dishes." Here the word "despite" is not a member of the proposal, but serves to attach a subordinate concession, so it is written together.

In order to help those who study Russian and doubt the spelling, it is possible to offer such a clue: if the words "regardless" or "despite" have a preposition "on", then this is an alliance, and it should be written together with "not", but In the absence of such there is observed the use of gerunds, which must be used separately with "not".

Punctuation marks

Often the construction of unions "despite" and "despite" is used, in order to attach the subordinate concessionary to the main part. Examples: "Despite progress, there are still such corners on the planet where the standard of living of the population is horribly low". In such constructions, the union "regardless of" or "in spite of" is a part of the subordinate part. It should be remembered that the dependent sentence is separated from the main comma.

Signs in the unions "despite the fact that" and "no matter what"

Often an extended union design is used. Then a comma is required. Usually this happens in cases when the main sentence with the help of "despite the fact that" or "despite the fact that" is attached subordinate concessions. The unions are separated by commas, which are put before the word "what". For example: "Despite the fact that the couple lived together for more than half a century, they managed to maintain tenderness and mutual understanding."

Attaching a subordinate concession to allied words

Along with the above-mentioned unions, there is another way of joining the dependent part of the proposal. To attach, union words are often used in combination with the particle "neither", for example: no matter what, no matter how much. Usually in this role are interrogative and relative pronouns and adverbs.

By the way, the presence of the amplifying particle "ni" once again emphasizes the accentuating role of the subordinate concession, as was said at the beginning of the article. When writing these union words with particles, one should not confuse "neither" nor "not." Examples: "No matter how much Tatiana cried on winter evenings, Eugene's attitude towards her did not change for the better." We see a complex sentence with an additional clause, which is joined by the union word "how much" with the amplifying particle "ni". "Tatyana did not cry more, and her attitude to her began to change for the better." This is a compound sentence, the particle "not" with the verb is used for negation.

Differences between the subordinate concession and the isolated circumstance of assignment

Sometimes it is possible to meet the construction of sentences, which are extremely similar in meaning. However, when syntactically parsing, they should be distinguished. These are complex sentences, in which there are subordinate concessionary subordinate clauses, and simple ones, where the concession is expressed through a separate circumstance. The difficulty in distinguishing these constructions is that the dependent part of the complex sentence and the individual member answer the same question. In order for this idea to become more understandable, it is necessary to look at the examples.

1. "Despite the fact that all the members of the expedition laughed and joked, the feeling of anxiety did not leave Alexei ..." A complicated sentence with a subordinate concessionary "despite the fact that everyone laughed and joked," to which one can ask the following question: "Despite what ? "As evidence, in this dependent part of the complex we distinguish the main terms of the sentence:" members of the expedition "- subject," joked "and" laughed "- homogeneous predicates.

2. "Despite the laughter and jokes of all members of the expedition, Alexei's feelings of anxiety did not leave Alexei ...". A simple sentence with the subject "feeling of anxiety" and the predicate "did not leave". The concession is present in a separate circumstance "despite the laughter and jokes of all the members of the expedition," which, like the subordinate, answers the question "in spite of what?"

In order not to make mistakes when writing texts, one should remember: the subordinate concession is allocated with commas; Part of the unions "despite" and "despite" are written together; With allied words, the "ni" amplifying particle is used.