Arts & EntertainmentTV

"Voice" show, season 4: reviews about mentors. Reviews of the audience about the project "Golos", season 4

Friday evening on Channel One gathers and unites spectators watching the vocal talent show "Golos" at the screens. For the fourth year in a row, the intrigue surrounding the transfer does not go away, but, on the contrary, new, sometimes sharp discussions arise. More and more interested people are following the events in the "Voice" show. 4 season reviews of the incompetence of the jury gathered the most critical for the entire existence of the program. Maybe this is a paid PR? Or have people really become so picky in music that they easily criticize professional singers and even people who came to casting?

Where's the idea?

The choice of the performer by ear, without vzgyad on it, is the basic concept of the teleproject "Voice". It belongs to Dutch television. The format of the foreign show appeared in 2010, and two years later the Russian audience could see that it was possible to get to the stage with talent rather than influential connections. The new idea of the project immediately won the domestic audience. The jury, the contestants, the repertoire - everything suited the viewer in the show "The Voice". 4 season unsatisfactory reviews got for the first time during the implementation of the project.

This program is broadcast in more than fifty countries around the world. The concept of the show was so popular with the public that there was a similar program about impartial music selection among children.

Purpose of the competition

Everybody liked the show "Star Factory", which revealed many talents, since 2002, the viewer has become uninteresting. Times are changing, and requests are growing. The audience is not surprised by the usual selection of singers. Therefore, the idea of choosing a vocalist who sings the song live to the jury members turned with their backs to the singer has a little dispelled doubts about the corruption selection of modern show business stars.

That is, the purpose of the contest is to identify the vocal qualities of the performer, and not his appearance, age or hairstyle. Professionals in the form of mentors are not distracted by the image of the speaker, but listened attentively to his singing data.

The passions are expressed, expressed by the stormy discussion of the show "The Voice" (season 4). Reviews of the audience in the majority are aimed at the incompetence of Polina Gagarina, they say, she is too young for the coach of beginning singers. However, it is worth remembering that the girl herself was a participant and winner of the "Star Factory" and who, if not she, knows the way to success in such contests.

Competition Rules

Reviews about the show "The Voice" (season 4) are full of criticism. The main emphasis in discussions is on the panel of judges. The rules of the project foresee four mentors invited from a galaxy of artists of the domestic music scene, who at each stage of the show form a team of singers.

The first step in the selection is blind listening, and if a member of the jury likes the performance of the song, then he turns to the participant, thereby giving consent to be his mentor. When the team is assembled, the struggle between the contestants within the group belonging to one mentor begins.

In the final of the show there are 4 performers: only one from each member of the jury. The winner chooses the viewer. He is vigorously discussing the jury, images, comments and other moments occurring in the "Voice" program. 4 season, the reviews are contradictory, caused even greater interest in the transfer. Now even the curious spectator, after reading the discussion of the show, will necessarily want to see it.

The initial composition of the jury

Three seasons in the TV show of the chair of experts and further teachers were held by: AB Gradsky, LN Agutin, D. Bilan and Pelageya. Experience vs. youth. The jury represented a certain balance, where two singer, composer, honored artist of Russia Alexander Borisovich and Leonid Nikolaevich are on one side of the scale, and on the other - pop music performer, Eurovision participant Dmitry Bilan and folk singer Pelageya.

The panel of judges in this composition quickly won the love of the public. This is understandable, because they are the first. Before this show was not, and their behavior set the usual ways for the viewer to select. However, the mentality of the Russian public is based on conservative views.

And the sudden change of habitual can cause sharp reviews. About the project "The Voice" (season 4), the public speaks of an unsuccessful attempt to raise the rating of the program. Replacement of judges is a marketing move of the channel's management.

It was such changes that became the reason, which caused sharp reviews about the project "Golos" (season 4). Even if other domestic stars were chosen as mentors, they, most likely, would fall into disgrace towards the viewer.

Intrigue season 4

In order to make the television product interesting, every year they introduce changes into it. So, in the second season, the number of contestants was expanded, tactics for "kidnapping talents" were introduced, when the retired singer could be bailed out by another mentor. And by the fourth season the leadership of the TV project decided to change the panel of judges. The viewer was eagerly awaiting a new release to see who got the red chairs. September 4, 2015 became known to new mentors show "Voice" (season 4). Comments on the change of the jury immediately acquired a negative color.

The new jury (like the previous composition) has become balanced. LN Agutin was replaced by Honored Artist of the Russian Federation, as well as composer GV Leps. The young board was represented by the pop singer PS Gagarin, the participant of Eurovision, as well as Bilan; Composer and opened to the viewer in a new role rapper Basta, whom the jury calls each other his real, unaccustomed name for the public Vasily.

Remained in his chair only Maitre Gradsky - the referee, who wrote mostly positive reviews. About the mentors of the show "The Voice" (season 4) now does not speak only lazy. The public is vigorously criticizing every word and action of mentors.

Who else has been criticized?

Alexander Borisovich noted in an interview that more prepared participants came to the second "Voice". And this is thanks to the pioneers from the first season, who proved that this is not a television game, but a real show. In the first TV project, the modest and confident Dina Garipova won. In 2013, the show conquered the outrageous appearance of Nargis, although it did not become a winner. The third season surprised viewers with the next victory of the participant from the Gradsky team. They became a graduate of the Alexander Gnesins' Academy, who fell in love with the public and received praiseworthy reviews.

About the mentors of the show "The Voice" (season 4), the public expresses itself as a reason why they do not want to continue watching the show. Although the leaders of the program did not achieve this, following the jury members. In the discussions of the critic came to the participants. The public began to be perplexed by the shortage of talented performers. And every spectator speaks about the falsity of the performance, considering himself a musical reviewer, not taking into account the experience and profile education of the judges of the show. The forums write that the new members of the jury do not have the talent to competently criticize, let alone give instructions to young performers. Except for one teacher. Alexander Gradsky for the fourth time became a member of the judging panel of the project and is the most qualified, according to viewers, specialist in the show "The Voice" (season 4). Comments on the mentors on the emotionality and sharpness in the statements overtook the issues of the past. Maybe this season will be the last in the history? And, perhaps, the triumphant return of previous teachers will happen? Or the viewer will get used to the new referees, and Show "Voice" (season 4) reviews Will get complementary?

What did not please the new jury?

A survey conducted among the audience on the subject of which of the members of the jury is most annoying, the results showed the following: Grigory Leps (43%) became the winner, Polina (37%), Baste (12%), and fourth (8%) to Gradsky.

G. Leps in the show "Voice" (season 4) reviews critical for arrogant behavior. People got the impression that he was doing a favor by participating in this project. Most likely, he has such an idea in this show. The role of the self-confident and strict member of the jury.

Polina in the project "The Voice" (season 4) reviews the audience received unflattering because of the imitation of the previous mentor Pelagee and replay. However, she is a girl and also beautiful, why not flirt? It's a show, not a selection for the Conservatoire. Any reaction of the viewer is a success, a rating and money. It is unlikely that the management of a teleproduct is so illiterate as to invite uninteresting personalities.

Surprised all Vasily Vakulenko. The rapper liked the rapper with his restraint and humanity.

A. Gradsky, being a teacher from God and who brought up the winners in three seasons, became boring to the public. And the numbers of his performers do not arouse their former delight.

The response of mentors to criticism

Since September, there has been a teleproject "Voice" on the First Channel (season 4). Reviews of the viewers about the mentors are still negative. Members of the panel of judges in their interviews immediately spoke about what was happening. To the attacks of the public Polina reacted with understanding. The main thing is that she feels support from the fans and the family. And rumors about the lack of experience compared with Pelagia, she denied. Gagarin is only one year younger than the previous mentor and professionally on stage performs for 10 years, so he has enough knowledge to raise a talented performer.

Leps and Basta could not refuse the offer to take part in the show "Golos" (season 4). Reviews about the mentors are diametrically opposed.

Grigory in the interview said that it is difficult for him to select performers blindly, because the artist in his understanding is not only a singing person, but also an image, facial expressions, gestures. Basta, who felt his inappropriateness in the TV project, felt the excitement during blind auditions. I chose performers not by vocal data, but by the ability to surprise.

"Voice", 4 season: reviews of viewers about the repertoire

In addition to dissatisfaction with the composition of the jury, the performers, the violent reaction of people fell on the repertoire.

After the lapse of the first season, the management of the television project amended the further choice of songs by the contest participants. It happened after the negative statements of the offended vocalists to the editors of the First Channel, that they were obviously given bad songs. They suggested that the contestant personally make a list of songs that musical editors will cut from 60 to 10 songs. And any of the 10 songs the singer undertakes to sing.

In discussions, the public speaks out about the lack of Russian songs in the repertoire of performers. The transfer is a foreign analogue, but after all, in Holland do not perform Russian songs, say the audience.

And there is an excuse for this. Music producers already call on the contestants to sing original pieces. After two hours of folk music simply reduce the number of viewers, so the repertoire of performers varied. And the ability to sing in a foreign language is one of the manifestations of talent.

Positive feedback on the "Voice" program: season 4

People's opinions were divided about the program. But both of them like the irreplaceable host D. Nagiyev. TV viewers like the humor and charisma of men. And, maybe, the fact is that the female part occupies a large part of the audience, that's why the handsome Nagieva is honored for the show's dignity, and Polina (the dyed blonde) is not at work there at all?

From approving responses - to the televiewer the transmission format is impressed. Only four years have passed, and fans are looking forward to the new season. In the editions of past years, too, there was criticism of the judiciary and repertoire. Most likely, this is what the bosses of the TV project seek. To boil the discussion, and raised the rating.

What to expect?

While viewers leave reviews of the "Voice" show on the expanses of the World Wide Web, season 4 is confidently approaching the final match of the participants. A month left before the announcement of the winner.

Discussions, criticism, incompetence of the jury - any feedback on the project "The Voice" (season 4) - all this is secondary. The format of the show is aimed at getting pleasure from setting up rooms, listening to music and remarks by jury members.

After all, at home, sitting on the couch, it's easy to criticize and blame the incompetence of people who have become famous for their work and perseverance. This is not a selection in the Philharmonic. Professional people do the show. And it is successfully moving to the masses.

Similar articles

 

 

 

 

Trending Now

 

 

 

 

Newest

Copyright © 2018 en.delachieve.com. Theme powered by WordPress.