Political leader: what is he like in the conditions of modern society?

Every political leader must have specific character traits, the ability to lead and influence the population, and also be able to achieve the set goals. Leadership is characterized by the use of certain political styles that can be effective and ineffective, as well as authoritarian and democratic. The style is focused on the solution of specific tasks, which is achieved through a clear distribution of roles and functions, as well as the receipt in the submission of such an individual of all possible and necessary resources.

A political leader is a person who must lead millions. And this is not for everyone. Agree that not all people on the planet become such individuals, their units. Such abilities are based on non-standard thinking and the ability to persuade. Based on many criteria, there are different typologies of political leadership.

So, according to the scale, international leaders are distinguished, as well as those who represent a certain class or stratum of society.

Let us note that the political leader, according to the theory of the philosopher M. Berne, can be a transformer or a businessman. The first of them works on the accepted concept of social development. As for the second type, his representative focuses on the details, but does not focus on the global position of developing a project of what the society should be like as a result of the events held.

An interesting interpretation was given by the philosopher and political scientist Pareto, who divided political leaders into "lions" and "foxes". "Foxes" combine the ability to maneuver, hide their intentions, anticipate the outcome of the situation, in general, act cunningly and cautiously. Politicians, "lions" are more straightforward in their actions, they use the method of force pressure and often fall into the trap. They fight against the enemy in the open.

Note that the types of political leaders that are being developed and still are largely formed according to the interpretation of M. Weber. He distinguished:

1. A traditional form of leadership, which is based on a firm belief in the foundations and their steadfastness. An example is the situation when a political leader becomes not by conviction, but according to tradition: the son of a monarch becomes his successor.

2. Charismatic leadership, when people blindly believe in the chances of a leader with charisma and charm that he is given from above.

3. Rationally legal. In this case, the political leader is chosen by the people, which is based on the belief in the legitimacy of the order and legitimacy of the process.

The philosopher of all three points considered the most interesting charismatic type, because here trust is based solely on sympathies and divine intervention. Therefore, the relationship of such a leader and the masses is of a mystical nature, and the people require complete obedience to the leader who fulfills the supreme mission. As a rule, a political leader of this type is found in many systems.

Examples are the following personalities: Lenin, Stalin, Mao Zedong, Hitler, Mussolini, F. Castro and others. And these leaders can not be assessed unequivocally. In the period of the highest crisis, such a person can only rally the people with his own eyes and reassure him. However, this state of affairs is not always justified and painless for the masses.

Any political leader needs the support of the people, however, he must have certain characteristics that distinguish him from the populist. First of all, such a person must be able to lead the people. And he must, when necessary, activate the masses for action, but also in time to contain them, if the situation is at the limit.