Morphological analysis of the gerundive

The term "gerundive" appeared in the XVII century and is made up of two parts (dee + participle). It is a form of the verb, which calls in the sentence a secondary additional action. According to grammatical features it is very similar to the adverb, because it does not change. Morphological analysis of the verbal participles consists in the indication of only permanent signs, it does not have non-permanent features.

Morphological analysis of the gerundive

1. Name a part of the speech, indicate the general grammatical meaning.

2. List the morphological features:

- indicate the initial form (an undefined verb form);

- recurrence;

- view;

- Transitivity;

- Unchangeability.

3. Determine which syntactic role in the sentence performs.

Note!

Sometimes it is difficult to distinguish between participles and adverbial participles. In order to cope with this, it is necessary to understand that the participle, the verbal participle and the verb are verbal forms, and hence are connected with the meaning of the action. First of all, questions will help to distinguish them. The conjugated forms of the verb respond to the following: "what do I do?", "What will I do?", "What have I done?", "What have I done?", "What are you doing?", "What will you do?" And others. To the gerund there can be asked the question "what are you doing?" Or "what is done?", As well as the semantic, syntactic, helping to determine its role in the sentence: "how?", "When?", "Why?". For example: Stomp, holding hands, around the fire (stomp like?). After completing the exercise, the guys raised their hands (raised when?). After falling ill, I went to the hospital (when did I go?).

To the communion you can ask the question "what do you do?", "What did you do?", "What did you do?".

Also, when distinguishing both participles and gerunds, suffixes help:

- the gerundive of the imperfect species is formed from the verb stem in the present tense of the imperfect type with the help of the suffix -a, (-y): read - read, live - living;

- the gerundive of the perfect species is formed from the base of the infinitive of the perfect species with the help of the suffix -b, -shi, -sh: to make - having made, having made, fall - having fallen, having fallen.

In addition, performing the morphological analysis of gerunds, it is necessary to indicate its recurrence: the return (with postfix-s, -y) and irrevocable (without such).

Single verbal participles sometimes lose the signs of the verb and pass into the category of adverbs. In this case, the former gerunds do not mean an additional action (they are not replaced by verbal forms, they do not answer the questions "what did you do?", "What are you doing?"), But only indicate the sign of the action and answer the question "how?". For example: The guys silently listened to me (they listened to how? - silently, it's an adverb, and not a girlish participle).

Morphological analysis is carried out necessarily in the context, writing out the verbal participle together with the verb, the additional action of which it means.

Written morphological analysis of the gerundive

Pyatak, ringing and bouncing, rolled along the road.

The link (rolled)

1. The link - depres.

2. Rolled (how? What doing?) Ringing. N.f. To ring.

Morf. Signs: nesov. In., Non-return, unper., Unm.

3. (How? What's doing?) The link.

Bouncing (rolled)

1. Bouncing - depres.

2. Rolled (how? What's doing?) Bouncing. N.f. - bounce.

Morf. Signs: nesov. In., Non-return, unper., Unm.

3. (How? What's doing?) Bouncing.

Oral morphological analysis of the gerundive

The link (rolled)

1. The link - the gerund, signifies a secondary action.

2. Rolled (how? What doing?) Ringing. The initial form is to ring.

Morphological features: imperfective, non-transient, intransitive, invariable verbal form.

3. The sentence performs the syntactic role of the circumstances.

Bouncing (rolled)

1. Bouncing - giri participles, signifies a secondary action.

2. Rolled (how? What's doing?) Bouncing. The initial form is to jump up and down.

Morphological features: imperfective, non-transient, intransitive, invariable verbal form.

3. The sentence performs the syntactic role of the circumstances.