Error opening the codec Sony Vegas 13: how to fix the simplest methods

Many users working with video editing can face such a problem: in the message about the impossibility of adding objects, an error is displayed when opening the Sony Vegas codec. 13. How to fix it, now it will be shown. To do this, you can use at least two options.

Error opening codec Sony Vegas 13 (Windows 8, 10, 7): fixing the simplest method

If you judge the nature of the error itself, it's easy to see that the problem is that for some reason the codec itself stopped working or just was not installed. So, in the simplest case, you need to install it.

The first solution, if there is an error when opening the codec Sony Vegas 13, will be access to special Internet resources, where you can download a full package of codecs designed for a certain version of the OS.

When the installation file is fully loaded, it should be started with administrator rights. But do not rush to continue installation right away, because a lot of extraneous garbage can be installed on the computer (for example, Password Box and a lot of unnecessary trash). Therefore, in the selection window of the installation method, you need to use the Detailed Installation line.

Next, just agree with the license agreement and click the continue button. After that, you will be asked to make additional settings, where basically you can not change anything, and immediately double click on the Apply button. After that, a message will be displayed about the successful installation. It remains only to run the program and work as if nothing had happened.

Error opening codec Sony Vegas 13: an alternative codec package

Another method is also related to the installation of codecs. If the program persistently reports that an error occurred while opening the Sony Vegas 13 codec, you can download an alternative and, perhaps, the most versatile package for all occasions.

This is a set of K-Lite codecs. You can use three versions of the package at will - Basic, Standard and Full (this is as you like it). In any case, this package differs favorably from all others in that it does not create problems for the user in terms of conflicts between the codecs themselves and is more "easy" in both work and consumption of system resources.

Naturally, when choosing the version of the package, one should be guided by considerations about what exactly will be needed in the work, after all, the installation of additional codecs can become completely inexpedient. But this is not a problem either, since the package itself takes up a minimum of space on the hard drive, but when you choose a full modification in some cases, you can achieve that in other programs you can even use some undocumented features.

And, of course, if you try, on the same Internet you can find a huge number of packages with codecs and decoders of any level. However, among all that is proposed for download and installation, these two options seem most acceptable. However, depending on your needs, you can choose something that is narrowly focused and corresponds only to the needs of the user.

What to use?

Which package should I prefer? In principle, both sets are good, however, due to the lightness and stability, it is better to give preference to the second option. By the way, if you use additional installation parameters when installing the second package, it will be useful in the future, for example, to work with other types of multimedia. For example, even in the video editing program itself, when adding audio tracks, such codecs will come in handy. And this is not talking about other applications or even playing video and audio. And to work with sound, not counting the integration into the system of special ASIO drivers, so there is simply no better tool for any professional.

However, for novice users who are just learning the basics of video or audio processing, such a package must necessarily be in stock. And the reproduction of the newest formats of the same video is not discussed at all. Thus, the conclusion can be made unambiguous: K-Lite in all respects looks much more preferable, due to its exceptional versatility.