Brief and full participles: differences

Everyone knows how mysterious and difficult for studying our Russian language. In it "dwells" a huge number of parts of speech and their various forms. Short and full participles are particularly difficult. The distinctive features of these verbal forms are discussed in more detail.

Features

Linguists have not yet decided what place in the morphology to give the sacraments. The authors of textbooks on the Russian language are very different about this issue. Some argue that it is only a form of the verb, which expresses not only the action, but also its sign. Others say that it is completely independent and refers it to parts of speech. But one thing is known: brief and full participles are simply irreplaceable for our speech. Without them, we will endlessly use the word "which". For example:

A singing man is a person who sings.

A sick child is a child who is sick.

The work done is the work that was done.

Having with him various dependent words, the sacrament is part of the participial turnover that adorns our speech.

For example: The wind blowing from the sea refreshed my face.

Full Form

One of the features of this part of the speech is the ability to form forms. More than adjectives, this is beyond the power of any part of speech.

The full and short form of the participles differ both grammatically and syntactically. How can they not be confused? The full form is called passive participles, which usually answer the question "what". They are called afflicted because they assume in their meaning an action performed by someone.

It is impossible to form a succinct from actual participles .

Example: Acquired - acquired, solved - resolved.

Short and complete passive participles perform different syntactic functions. All because they have different purposes. The full form, answering the question "what", is a definition. This is her main resemblance to the adjective.

Therefore, the participle included in the turnover is usually called a separate definition.

Do not forget about punctuation. If the participial turnover, which includes only full forms, is after the word being defined, then in this case the commas on both sides are necessarily put.

The forest, enveloped in a haze, is very beautiful.

If the turnover goes after the main word, then in this situation commas are not put in any case: The work done on time has been approved .

Short form

As we managed to find out, the short and full participles are similar in many respects, but the roles play different roles.

This form is formed by cutting off the endings from the complete and joining the other endings: held - carried out (removed and part of the suffix, adding -a).

Consider the proposal: The trip was paid. The short form of the full participle "paid" is no longer a characteristic of the sign of the action. Now she herself shows the process, being part of the predicate. Thus, the short form plays the role of the main member of the proposal.

The main feature is that short and full participles can vary by birth. Written - written, laid - laid, lost - lost .

To distinguish them is not so difficult. Correctly given to the sacrament the question will help to easily distinguish the short form from the complete.