Which material is cheaper to build a house? Where to buy materials for building a house

Deciding to build a house, we carefully plan the construction process itself, and also look for ways to save money. Of course, the erection of residential buildings is not the cheapest pleasure today, but it is not worth saving by choosing construction materials for the construction of a house. Today, when you can use modern technology and no less innovative materials, you can cheaply build a very high-quality and good-quality cottage. That is why it is necessary to proceed to the selection of building materials competently and carefully.

Frame: easy to erect!

Today, more often for the construction of housing used wireframe technology. Choosing which material is cheaper to build a house, many people choose the choice on the frame. As a rule, it is based on economical housing. The frame itself can be wooden or metal. It is noteworthy that along with the speed of erection such a cottage will be distinguished by ecological safety, good thermal insulation properties, durability and safety in operation. Manufacturers guarantee that frame houses can stand about 40 years if the frame is wooden, and 100 years old, if the frame is metal.

The very technology of erection is simple, and therefore it is not necessary to involve a team of workers. First, a frame is constructed, which serves as the basis of the house. For insulation, mineral wool or rock is most often used. Materials for the construction of the house, namely the skeletons of walls, ceilings, are produced in the factory, after which they are delivered to the facility, where they are assembled. Outside, the frame must be covered with non-combustible materials, the interior of the insulation and vapor barrier is required.

Finishing the frame house

To equip the exterior of the residential building, you can use a lining, siding, facing brick or plaster, as well as facade paint. Finishing materials for the home today are presented in huge numbers, so there will not be any problems with their choice. The feature of frame houses is that they do not shrink, so you can proceed to finishing immediately after the completion of construction. In addition, frame housing - the most economical. Firstly, due to the ease of the material, a strong foundation will not be required, and this means significant savings in materials. Secondly, the finish - clean inside and outside - may not be required, because the walls are smooth and even.

Today, the number of frame houses is about 12% of all under construction, for example, in the Moscow region. But in view of the economy and convenience of technology, more and more consumers deserve it. So, to build a two-storey cottage on the basis of frame technology costs about the same as to buy an apartment of the same area in the high-rise economy class.

Wood - traditional material

Many people think that the best material for a house is a tree. They are right, but it is the tree that is the most expensive solution for the construction of housing. Of course, there are technologies that can reduce costs. For example, the use of a solid beam. Housing from it turns out modern, thus the profile of the house will be traditional. But wooden construction has its drawbacks, and the most important of them is the shrinkage of the house, which affects the possible deformation processes, as well as an increase in the time for further finishing. It is because of her that it's very important to follow the construction technology.

Glued beams: beautiful, but expensive

When building housing, many people proceed from the material from which it is cheaper to build a house. However, this approach is not always correct, since such properties as reliability and durability of housing should play the main role. In this regard, the glued beam fits as well as possible, since it does not shrink and does not deform. Probably, this is one of the most high-quality materials for construction, as the bar passes chamber drying. Elements of it are glued together by highly ecologically safe composition, which is absolutely safe for tenants.

Round log: a house in the traditions of Russian architecture

Wooden materials for building a house are the best, because They are characterized by excellent heat-saving properties, environmental safety, as well as a "breathing" structure. Thanks to this, there is an opportunity to save considerably on the construction process, since any processing of the building will not be necessary. At the same time, the size of the savings will depend on how well the design of the house is properly compiled.

In any case, the erection of housing from round logs will be economical. Firstly, the material is light, and the foundation for it will be shallow. Secondly, the rounded log allows you to create a certain color in the room, which means there will simply be no need for finishing.

Aerated concrete - a worthy alternative to brick

Gas-silicate blocks, as well as cellular concrete gradually replace the brick so popular with antiquity. Of course, it yields its positions gradually, and its main disadvantage is low thermal insulation properties. That is, it turns out that the brick house will be colder than the housing of wood. To warm it will require quite a lot of money, and therefore more often when choosing which material is cheaper to build a house, it is used foam blocks and gas blocks.

First, they differ in the exact and unchanging geometry of the forms, due to what you can save on the seams. Most often, for gluing joints, a small amount of glue is sufficient. Secondly, this material is quite voluminous, and therefore it will take much less than the same brick for building a small house. Thirdly, to lay this material much easier and faster. Well, fourthly, aerated concrete is easy, and therefore it will not require too deep a foundation. That is, on its erection it will be possible to save considerably.

Features of aerated concrete as a material

Using this material for construction, we will be able to build a house that will meet the requirements of environmental friendliness and safety. By the way, it is environmental safety for many - the main indicator when choosing which material to build a house. It is noteworthy that the aerated concrete wall can stand under strong fire for about seven hours, which is a very impressive indicator. Resistance to the effect of fire allows the use of aerated concrete for the construction of objects of various spheres, from residential to industrial.

Due to its high environmental friendliness, the material also shows good vapor permeability. This is achieved due to the fact that aerated concrete is created from natural and natural raw materials: sand, water, lime. Accordingly, there are no impurities and no harmful substances in it. It is also important that the aerated concrete is easy to process, it can be cut with a regular saw, drilled, giving each block a certain shape. That is why the material is indispensable for those objects, which will be given an interesting architectural appearance.

Choosing which material is cheaper to build a house, it is important not to lose. For example, the decision to use gas blocks is more than advisable. First of all, because the walls of such material will be built at a low cost, accordingly, at this stage it will be possible to save almost two times. It is also important that gas blocks as a material are a worthy choice, since its characteristics greatly exceed the more familiar materials, for example bar or brick.

Interesting and modern solutions

A rather original solution may be the desire to build a house from improvised materials. For example, many heard that in the United States for a long time, housing was built from blocks of pressed hay or straw. It is noteworthy that the first such building was built in the XIX century, but it stood for several years, because it was eaten by cows. In more modern times, namely in 1940, straw production practically came to naught, because there were industrial construction technologies allowing to build more reliable and high-quality housing. However, there are advantages to this type of construction:

• Low cost, since one straw block could cost about 1,000 times less than a brick;
• The material would be shared;
• A small weight, and for the erection of the building would not require a massive foundation, the construction would be carried out without lifting mechanisms.

How to be?

As you can see, the cost of construction depends on many reasons. This is the correct design of the future housing, and a competent approach to the selection of materials, and compliance with the stages of technology construction. Only in case of taking into account the complex of these nuances it is possible to build a good and sound house, which not only will last a long time, but will also be economical in servicing.