The story of Mikhail Bulgakov's "Dog Heart": reviews, main characters, quotes

In 1988, domestic viewers first saw the painting "The Heart of a Dog" by V. Bortko. Reviews of the film were enthusiastic. The screen version of Bulgakov's story caused a storm of rejoicing. "Dog Heart", quotes from which today are known to almost everyone, before the creation of the film-screen adaptation was read by few. After the premiere, the book entered the compulsory list of literature of every intelligent person.

Reviews of the perestroika time

What is the reason for the popularity of the story "Dog Heart"? Feedback from the perestroika audience was not accidentally enthusiastic. Preobrazhensky's speeches on ruin and its causes proved extremely relevant in the conditions of chaos. The book shows the echoes of a lost state. In the late eighties the book was discussed everywhere: in the subway, electric trains, during the working break and, as it should be, according to the traditions of the Soviet intelligentsia, on small kitchens.

Reviews of modern readers

Thirty years have changed a lot. In the perception of the readers there was a significant shift. Somewhat differently began to talk about the book "The Heart of a Dog." Reviews on the story readers leave mostly positive. There are so many reviews of the book that it becomes clear: the urgency of the story of the transformation of a dog into a human being has not lost. The content of the reviews, meanwhile, has changed somewhat. Sharikov does not cause so much contempt. Monologues of the professor feel excessive conservatism.

The phrase that lovers of singing from below should take up their direct duties, namely, cleaning the outhouses, gives the image of Preobrazhensky contempt for the simple people. And this is no longer perceived by readers with such enthusiasm. What is the reason for the change in the perception of the story "Dog Heart"? Reader's reviews should be analyzed in parallel with the description of the main images. And they are unusually bright, capacious and more complex in Bulgakov's book than it seemed to readers at the end of the Soviet era.

Sharikov

"Dog Heart" - a story about how a practitioner and a scientist picked up a homeless dog from the street. He treated the poor Krakow sausage, took possession of his heart, penetrated the soul and thoughts. Became something like a deity. However, the dog turned into a victim of the experiment. A genius, a great, but absolutely meaningless.

Unsuccessful experiment

Why make a dog out of a dog? In order for a scoundrel Sharikov to appear in the world? But even if the pituitary was not used by the alcoholic Klim Chugunkin, but, for example, Spinoza, the event of the professor would in this case also have no meaning. Every woman can give birth to a woman. After all, she gave birth to Madame Lomonosov in the deep province of a brilliant son. This is the opinion of Preobrazhensky himself. However, he says it several months after the operation. But before in a huge apartment there is a mess.

Bulgakov "The Heart of a Dog" wrote at a time when the country was equipped with shvonders and the like. They acted decisively, because they believed in a speedy miracle. Magic, meanwhile, did not happen. It is impossible to simultaneously take revenge on tram tracks and decide the fate of foreign ragamuffins. The yesterday's locksmith can not manage a department of culture. It is unreal to make a human being from a dog, transplanting the human pituitary gland and giving the name of Sharikov.

The "dog's heart" is permeated with a disdainful attitude towards upstarts, "singers", to those whose faults the professorial galoshes disappeared. By the way, the name Sharikov took himself, which was not at all pleased with Philip Philipovich. The name of his victim caused a storm of anger. "In his stove!" - commanded by Professor Zina, learning that it was in the calendar that weighs in the front, Sharikov subtracted such a disingenuous name.

Heroes

What characters are central to the story "Dog Heart"? The main characters are Preobrazhensky, Bormental, Sharikov. A man with a dog's heart in his diary is described by the assistant professor as "creature". What other term can you call yesterday's dog, who, having lost his tail, began to ejaculate obscene language and play the balalaika? Sharikov quickly adapts to the new realities of time. Becomes "like-minded" Shvonder, receives a position in the "Cleaning".

A quarter of a century ago Sharikov-Chugunkin was associated with the departing past. Preobrazhensky - with a lost world, which (so anxious to believe it) will soon be restored. Years have shown that the destroyed can not be restored. At modern readers Polygraph Polygraphovich, probably, does not cause sympathy. But he, at least, deserves pity.

Preobrazhensky and his assistant

Bulgakov "The Heart of a Dog" wrote in an atmosphere close to the one that prevailed in the early nineties of the last century. In those days, Preobrazhensky and Bormental were perceived as models of intelligence. Today, readers note some brutality of the Aesculapius in relation to the ward.

People with university education seem unaware that it is foolish to expect from a being that wandered about in the rubbish for the third day, and yesterday was subjected to humanization, adequate behavior. However, from Sharikov and did not think to make a full-fledged member of the society Preobrazhensky. "Dog Heart" - a story about the unexpected result of an experiment. The professor was interested only in rejuvenation.

Take and share!

What is the main part of the story "The Heart of a Dog"? The main characters are in confrontation. Preobrazhensky and Bormental demand from Sharikov the behavior, worthy of their society. The former dog, burdened by the hypophysis of the alcoholic, does not take criticism into his address. The most famous are in the story "The Heart of a Dog" quotes Preobrazhensky and Sharikov. Some phrases became winged. Especially memorable were the dialogues, which the heroes of the book lead at dinner.

Ignorance of Sharikov shock doctors. If it were not for a miracle experiment, they would never be at the same table with someone who knows how to solve economic problems in the country in one fell swoop. Before the appearance of Polygraph Polygraphovich in a professorial house, Zina had never rushed to remove vodka so quickly from the table. The servants of Preobrazhensky did not burn in the furnace "Engels' correspondence with Kautsky."

"Yes, I do not like the proletariat"

This phrase aroused special enthusiasm among readers of the late eighties. And this is not surprising. The word "proletariat" filled the mind even with the children of representatives of the working class. Today's readers, born in the nineties, are hardly capable of understanding the profundity of professorial remarks.

"I'm not Isadora Duncan"

In the apartment of Preobrazhensky are people in leather coats. The reason for visiting the professorial by the choir is an excessive number of rooms. And here begins a tense dialogue between the witty owner of the apartment and the less eloquent members of the housing association.

Many years after the collapse of the Soviet state, when the anticommunist euphoria had long since disappeared, the readers looked at Preobrazhensky more objectively. Yes, it shone world science. Yes, he is an intellectual, an esthete and a strong personality, independent. But there is in him something of a philistine, a glutton who uses the Kremlin blat. However, in the book there is a moment that characterizes this hero as a person of high moral ideals.

Shortly before the "death" of Sharikov, Preobrazhensky and Bormental spend the whole evening discussing the future fate of Polygraph. The author does not dedicate the reader to the details of the conversation. But it is known that Preobrazhensky is not ready to go to a crime solely for the sake of Bormental. The hero also pronounces the wise phrase "Survive until old age with clean hands".

Terror does not achieve anything

Characteristic for Preobrazhensky are his statements about the way he treats a living being. Terror, says Professor, nothing can be achieved. He pronounces these words in connection with the appearance of Sharikov in the house. But they contain the author's opinion of the political events he witnessed.

Preobrazhensky regrets his actions. Already a few days after the operation, he understands what will be the final result of the experiment.

Shvonder

This character is a typical proletarian. The story is based on the antithesis. The person of the old time is contrasted with the image of the new. The author, of course, on the side of Preobrazhensky.

Shvonder is convinced that the most important thing in a person's life is a document. After all, where is it seen that a person without a residence permit lived? Characteristic features of this hero - importunity, insidiousness, bureaucratic habits. Even after Sharik's return to his habitual appearance, he does not stop, but continues to pester the professor.

What is the idea of the story "Dog Heart"? The theme of the book is the negative consequences of interference in the laws of nature. But this problematic of the work is not limited. First of all, Bulgakov raised questions of a social nature in the book The Dog's Heart.

The meaning of the book can be formulated as follows: a complex relationship between the intelligentsia and the proletariat. However, how many critics, so many opinions. About the story written a huge number of articles. But the main evaluation of the author's literary work is still reader's testimonials. And they are exclusively eulogies about Bulgakov's book.