Structure of the essay-reasoning on literature

Accurately and consistently express their own thoughts, logically argue without a mixture of contradictions - these qualities are important in any life situation. If a person is able to reason, then it will be easy for him to make the right choice, to defend his own opinion or assert himself. And the first step to learning to reason is the ability to correctly write essay-reasoning. Therefore, the structure of writing essay-reasoning is presented in this article.

What is composition-reasoning?

Composition-reasoning is a type of composition whose aim is to convince the reader of the correctness of a certain question. Such texts are found in different styles of speech: from the artistic to the scientific, where the author undertakes to prove or refute the process or phenomenon. The structure of the composition-reasoning in any variation necessarily includes a thesis content, which confirms the basic idea.

Compositions-reasoning is the most difficult in the school curriculum. They demand from the author not only a competent expression of thoughts, but also the ability to defend their position. In addition, the author should be well acquainted with the material, which he cites as arguments.

How's it going?

But in fact the situation is slightly different. The child comes from school and shows the parent a notebook with the task, they say, it is necessary to write an essay for tomorrow. Only in rare cases, parents together with the child write the text, trying to help him as little as possible. Most often adults start to wool Internet pages, browse additional literature or simply retell what is written in the textbook. They write the text on their own, and the child simply rewrites, without even realizing what is actually being said.

And everyone is very surprised when, in the end, the teacher says that the task was done incorrectly. Why is this happening? Children do not always take seriously the recommendations that the teacher gives. They forget that there is a certain structure of composition-reasoning. And adults, in turn, just write an essay that corresponds to the title.

To avoid such awkward moments, it will be useful for both parents and students to find out what the composition structure is-reasoning and why it is needed.

The actual structure

Each type of works has certain components that are mandatory in the performance. For the composition-reasoning, such components are theses and facts, which are confirmation of the main idea. The structure of the work-reasoning is as follows:

1. Thesis. This is the main idea of the text, which will be proved or refuted. For example: "First love is one of the most important periods of human life, which has a strong influence on further relationships."
2. Arguments. Each of the arguments must fully confirm this thesis. You can use quotes from famous people or examples from the literature.
3. Conclusions. In fact, the conclusion repeats the thesis, but it makes it more extensive, adding generalizations, forecasts and recommendations to the main idea.

Complicating the level

This is how the general structure of the work-reasoning on literature and the Russian language looks. Only three leaves, nothing complicated. Exactly the same text structure on a linguistic theme, but with some amendments.

Structure of the composition-reasoning on a linguistic theme:

1. Introduction . The suggested quotation is introduced as a thesis, the author agrees with these words.
2. Main part. It consists of two main components. First: it is necessary to give a short comment to the quotation, that is, the author must show that he understands its meaning. The second component is evidence, that is, the student must select from at least two arguments and examples from the proposed text, which would confirm the main thesis.
3. Actually conclusions.

GIA

Well, the structure of the composition of the reasoning on the Russian language is understandable. Now it is worth considering in practice how to apply it and where it can come in handy.

All students of the upper grades know such a terrible word as the GIA - the state final exam. Students of the 9th grade need to write an essay-reasoning on the basis of the material read, that is, a small text.

The structure of the composition-reasoning (GIA) is no different from the traditional, with one amendment - the arguments should be given from the read text. You can also quote quotes from the source material or simply write the numbers of sentences, which is confirmed by the author's idea.

Unified State Examination

In turn, the structure of the essay-reasoning (Unified State Examination, which is handed over by students of the 11th grade) corresponds to the original pattern. However, students must demonstrate a higher level of ability. It is necessary not only to judge the material read, but to point out the problem of the work. Moreover, it is necessary to write about your attitude to the main thesis and the work as a whole.

Also need to bring at least two arguments from the literature. You can write one example from life (if there is one). Competent writing essay-reasoning will not only bring good marks, but also help in the future constructively defend their point of view.

General recommendations

When the general structure of the composition-reasoning is disassembled, the question arises as to how to write the text correctly.

First of all, it is worth paying attention to the introduction. It should lead the reader to the main problem, which can be formulated in the form of a quotation or a question. For example:

• Children of the dungeon - who is this?
• The problem of truth in M. Gorky's play "At the bottom".

These lines lead the reader to certain reflections. Therefore, in the introduction, we can say that there are several points of view on this matter, and point to the one that the author adheres to.

When the introduction is created and the thesis is indicated, one can proceed to writing the arguments - the most important part. They should not be more than 2-4, but this does not negate the fact of persuasiveness. In addition, they must communicate with each other. For example, if we talk about the problem of truth in the play "At the bottom" by M. Gorky, then it is worthwhile to find the words of Luke, Satin and Bubnov. Each of them has its own truth, which, in fact, determines this problem in the work.

And, finally, the conclusion, in which it is necessary to draw conclusions and sum up the results. To do this, you can use the following guidelines:

• Conclusion is to start with a phrase that brings to the total. For example: "So ...", "So ...", "Summing up ...".
• The facts that were given above, do not need to be recited once more, because the conclusion sums up the most important thing that is written in the work. To list the main thoughts, you can use the introductory: "first," "secondly," and so on.
• It is worth noting that the genre focus of the work does not imply categorical conclusions. The author is a researcher who has his own hypothesis. So do not write that you need to think this way, and not somehow in a different way.

Do not forget about the "decoration" of the work. Of course, this task assumes that the author will operate with facts and arguments in his work. However, do not make the text dry and bezemotsionalnoy substance. Composition-reasoning is a creative work. Therefore, it is necessary to touch the reader's emotions and provoke him into his own thoughts. A good solution will be the use of an epigraph or quotations from other works.

It is important to "immerse" the reader in the problem that is considered in the work. This can be done, not only by citing examples from the text, but also by comparing the main problem with modernity. For example, in defending the problem of truth in Gorky's play "At the Bottom," one can say that every person has his own truth in the modern world. And whoever the person is, in whatever position he is, he will believe in his truth and try to present it to others, regardless of the consequences.

Example of an essay

Since the structure of the essay-reasoning has already been considered, an example of such a text will not be superfluous. It will clearly show what structure should be and how to operate with evidence.

Why do tales need adults?

It's easy to answer why children need stories, but why read them to adults?

The main feature of the fairy tale is the ability to educate, give vital lessons, teach patience and responsibility. The fairy tale has a positive impact on emotions and character. Here good always overcomes evil. Each story has a happy ending, which gives hope to a bright future and brings up good qualities, which it is important to preserve in any situation.

Once I was told that there are children who have never read fairy tales. It is not right! After all, childhood is also a fairy tale, and the most important, magical element was taken from it. And sometimes you think about what kind of adults these children have become. They hardly grew up to be kind and sympathetic people. Anger and cruelty - these qualities are so common in our time that they become something ordinary. Vandalism, terrorism, crimes - how to explain these phenomena? Only by the fact that adults who commit unlawful acts did not have fairy tales in their childhood.

The conclusion suggests itself: a fairy tale for adults is not just necessary, but catastrophically necessary. Only in it are important vital laws that help preserve kindness, faith and responsiveness.

I always liked the fairy tale about Cinderella. If all adults read it, they could learn kindness and patience. Yes, the main meaning of this tale is known to everyone, it's a classic of the genre. But if you go into history, you can see that the main character always believes in good, smiles and knows that her dreams will come true sooner or later. And no matter how much the evil stepmother and step-sisters did not mock her, the darkness can not extinguish the ray of light that lives in the girl's heart.

Now it is difficult to find a person who will readily understand and support the other. We learned to hear, but not listen. Talk, but do not open your heart. Therefore, it is worth reading a few tales, they will show that in sincerity there is nothing shameful, evil always loses, and good triumphs. Only then it will be possible to see the beauty of this world and enjoy it in full.

How correctly to argue?

To learn the correct judgment, you need to constantly ask yourself the question "why?". Why did the hero do this, and not otherwise? Why does one say one thing and do another? Why do insults hurt some, but do not disturb others?

Only by building a logical chain of judgments, one can find the right answer. Reasoning about important and even insignificant questions, a person becomes a little wiser and kinder. Even if he has not revealed the truth, he realizes that other people may have a different opinion, and becomes more tolerant. But at the same time, the knowledge that was given to him through long reflection, he will defend, giving weighty arguments.