Popular Myths About Nlp

Like any interesting and effective modern technology, the practice of neuro-linguistic programming of NLP finds both its supporters and opponents. Numerous myths about NLP have spread in the mass consciousness , which are the reason that the mention of the abbreviation of NLP often causes a skeptical smile in the average person. So is there any truth in these myths, or do they only seem like superstition? In this article, we will examine the most popular myths about NLP.

The first myth is associated with the allegedly unscientific status of NLP. It should be noted here that the lack of information on some new scientific areas and areas, and in the twentieth century a considerable amount of them appeared, is not a sufficient reason for including them as unscientific. With the same success, it is possible to declare quantum physics, the subject of which is no less difficult for specialists than the subject of NLP , with the help of antiscientific quackery. The techniques of neural-linguistic programming have a serious theoretical basis and represent one of the directions of psychotherapy, however, not being confined only to it. At the origin of the theory of NLP - the German psychologist and psychiatrist Frederick Perls, the famous psychologist and psychoanalyst Erik Erickson, American psychologist Virginia Satir. In fact, NLP is an effective practical psychology, aimed at a concrete result and taking into account the basic principles of the structure of our inner world. In particular, beliefs.

Many people are afraid even of the first and one-time acquaintance with NLP because of the possibility to fall under another's influence, to become the object of manipulation, which gives rise to the second myth about NLP as a means of total control over someone else's personality. Of course, such an alarm itself is not unfounded. But for the sake of justice it should be said that control over someone's personality can be obtained more simply, not through self-development and comprehension of the meanings of human communication. The technique of NLP can be compared with the use of household items, for example, an ax, a hammer, a knife: they can be used both for their intended purpose and for the purpose of committing murder. It all depends on what goals you set for yourself. For example, the popularity that NLP techniques received in a certain environment of not entirely honest people, led to the fact that NLP began to be considered a weapon of swindlers, business coaches and resourceful "pick-ups". But specialists involved in teaching NLP technology have long proved that its use for good is much more effective.

How ethical is the use of NLP techniques? The psychological impact in itself can not be good or bad. Just like physical energy is difficult to assess uniquely positively or negatively: it can destroy a city with a nuclear explosion or send a rocket into space. The reason for prejudice towards NLP is the use of force, the energy of words. Explaining the main idea of neuro-linguistic programming, the rector of the NLP Institute, Mikhail Mikhailovich Pelekhaty, in an interview with journalist Julia Tyszkiewicz, notes that "our words affect other people. It is because of them that wars are breaking out. NLP is engaged in that, firstly, it teaches us to clearly understand what the speech constructs lead to, and, secondly, it introduces a system of criteria for describing subjective experience. " It is difficult to say that in this approach there is something unfair and unprofitable for both sides.

And finally, one of the stable myths about NLP is related to the attitude to this practice as unconvincing and ineffective. In addition to the fact that this myth only works for those who are already actively mastering and using NLP, this version of the philistine myth is difficult to argue without getting acquainted with NLP in fact. Have the courage to learn something new! Only there you can check the arguments of public myths and stereotypes.

Http://www.institutnlp.ru/