Politics of the world: events and personalities

How long will the EU stretch and what can the Syrian truce turn out into? Was the world on the brink of disaster? About this and many other things in this article!

Who is in favor of the war?

The main news of the last days is, of course, the announced truce in Syria. The problem with this action is that Russia and some countries understand this term differently. The policy of the Russian Federation is initially aimed at a complete ceasefire by interested parties, while the United States still can not decide where the really bad guys are. At least there is clarity regarding the groups "Daishe" and "Dzhebhat an Nusra" (both are banned in the Russian Federation), but where did the equally odious "Jeychal-Islam", which is at war with everyone, and Akhrarash-Sham, whose goal - the overthrow of the Assad regime?

From midnight on Saturday (February 27, 2016), the Russian Air Force stopped aerial strikes against bandit formations, which applied to the "Reconciliation Center". Nevertheless, about a hundred militants from Turkey with the support of heavy artillery from the Turkish side crossed the border the same night and occupied the outskirts of the town of Ettle Tell el-Abyad, from which they were knocked out by Kurdish militia in the morning.

Considering the use of heavy artillery systems, we see that Turkey does not care about the "peace policy", although there is a UN resolution on ceasefire. Which is understandable, since President Erdogan is least interested in the world, for his dreams of the revival of the Ottoman Empire are crumbling.

Stone in the direction of Russia

The directions of the policies of a number of Middle Eastern states are quite clear. Take, for example, Saudi Arabia. King Salman bin Abdul-Aziz Al-Saud, a Saudi recently visited Moscow, where he had a private conversation with President of the Russian Federation V.V. Putin.

Details of this meeting are not particularly advertised, but they agreed on something exactly. And certainly not about that 28.02.2016 Adel al-Jubair, the head of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the kingdom, will accuse Syria and Russia of violating the truce. In the best traditions of Washington, no evidence of any provocative actions was presented.

Politics in the modern world is such that the tail is rotated by a dog, and not vice versa. Such is life, probably nothing to change. And by the way, a statement made by a well-known politician can be annulled by the careless dismissal of his deputy (let's recall Kerry's gesture on the question of S. Lavrov about Obama's statement). And given the specifics of the East, which, as you know, is a delicate matter, it is not at all clear how to regard Mr. Al-Jubair's statement. But taking into account his own remark that "there is no room for Assad in Syria," one can say with confidence: this diplomat is not at all inclined to a peaceful solution of the issue. Its task is to discredit the current Syrian authorities, and at the same time Russia.

Misty Affairs of Misty Albion

As the famous politician and part-time British Prime Minister D. Cameron says , Britain's withdrawal from the EU will be a wild adventure. However, it was he who actually put an ultimatum before the European Union: either we infringe on the rights of our migrants, or we are no longer with you. The EU, of course, does not want to lose such a partner, so Cameron managed to bargain for Britain a lot of indulgence, the main one of which - the reduction of the rights of migrants.

Now for the whole 4 years they can not live at the expense of taxpayers. So the country is no longer so attractive for fans of "life on a freebie", therefore, their inflow into the country will decrease.

23.06.2016 a referendum will be held on the issue of Britain's withdrawal from the EU. This, of course, is a big risk for the economy, as many members of the British business community have ventures abroad, with all the benefits and indulgences relying as a member of the European Union. It can also undermine cooperation in security matters, because all existing agreements will have to be reviewed and concluded again under new conditions.

The Prime Minister points out external threats, the solution of which can be full only in the European Union. This is both "Russian aggression", and "nuclear Iran", and a crisis with Middle Eastern migrants.

What do the British want?

The policy of the world in general and of Europe in particular is now under threat. According to polls conducted among the British, it is clear that the number of supporters and opponents of withdrawal from the EU is almost equal, and the majority of the members of the government advocates the preservation of membership. But we all know how Cameron likes to scare people and give out promises. No doubt, he sincerely cares for his country, its security and integrity.

Remembering the referendum in Scotland, when the prime minister climbed out to persuade the proud descendants of Wallace and Bruce not to separate from the state, we can draw a parallel. Then he also promised a heavenly life, self-government and everything you want. With a minimal advantage, unity prevails. But not one promise of Cameron was not fulfilled, which, however, did not encourage the Scots to mass protests.

The English are tired of visitors. Peaceful politics and notorious tolerance led to the fact that the stiff of Britain begin to dictate their own conditions in their own streets to the inhabitants of their former colonies, which can not but anger the people. And membership in the EU will make them equally bear the burden of helping the unfortunate inhabitants of Africa and the Middle East. So, 1-2 terrorist attacks in any British city or the information about raping a migrant by a woman in the media will lead the UK out of the EU with a majority vote, which will completely destroy the European Union.

What did Ukraine intend to fight?

As is known, the policy of Russia and the world does not always look at things the same way. For example, we do not threaten our neighbors with fists, counting their possible losses in advance, as did Mr. Fedichev from the Department of Social and Humanitarian Policy of the Defense Ministry of Ukraine. But, according to officials of independent Ukraine, this is a great way to show "allies" that they are strong and bold.

According to the forecasts of the above-mentioned humanities, the losses of the Russian army will be up to 20 thousand people. Only the dead, while the valiant APU will lose 4-5 times less. Yes, any textbook on tactics will say that the defender needs 3 times less strength for effective resistance. But if you remember that 4 waves of all-Ukrainian mobilization fell under the fire of miners with berdanki (at first there was no other weapon), and the recruits paid off or fled to Russia ...

Some questions ...

It does not agree with the recent statement of the Minister of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine A. Avakov, who said that the country does not have anything. It is necessary to create anew the APU, the police and the national guard, and then go to liberate the Crimea from the "occupiers". There is a reasonable question - about what forces Mr. Fedichev was going to fight. The policy of the Russian Federation is such that it does not intend to attack anyone. You can still understand the seizure of the Baltic States, as in 1940, because excess ports on the Baltic Sea will not interfere, but why should Russia destroy Ukraine?

Russian tanks in Europe?

This is what people who heard the statement of F. Bridlava, the commander of the NATO Joint Force in Europe, could think. And how else to regard his words about the US readiness to defeat Russia on European territory? General Breedlove is known for his Russophobic sentiments, although he did not sit for several years in a pit in Vietnam, like McCain. So he decided, apparently, on the eve of his resignation from the post, as M.Tornby, the head of the Committee on the affairs of the Congress, informed him, and farewell to scare the already shaky Europeans.

Directions of US policy go exclusively to confrontation with all disagreeable regimes, and soon it will be necessary to accept the country's budget and justify the increase in defense spending. It is in this context that the statement of the almost former commander should be considered.

Another thing is that Europe, in spite of Washington's hopes, does not want to aggravate an already complicated relationship with Russia. German students, unlike politicians, perfectly understand that in case of a strike across Russia from their territory, the answer will be in Berlin, and not over the Capitol Hill. So the next general's attack caused only bewilderment among the political elite of the Old World.

On the brink of war

The main problem of the "civilized world" is that it absolutely does not understand the direction of Russia's policy. The colonialist can not in any way understand that Russia is not the country that will fight with someone for expanding the living space or resources, and that's exactly what has always been the reason for the invasion.

The whole policy of the world has always been aimed at domination, on world hegemony. It was due to its own poverty and the presence of excessive ambitions. In some cases, states simply got rid of the declassed elements, referring them to distant lands with the promise of a new happy life.

The situation in the world: politics now is such that the entire planet is under threat of destruction. Leaders who could occasionally click on the "red button", always enough. Now the world is on the verge of a great war. Actually, everything could already begin, deciding the Russian military to get even for the shot down "Drying" in Syria.

Perhaps this is what was expected of her, for Article 5 of the NATO Charter clearly explains in what cases the Alliance is launching hostilities. But, as it turns out, miscalculated. The anti-Russian policy of peace, directed exclusively at the military annihilation of our country, once again failed. We hope that this will continue.

Summarize

In this article, we discussed the main political events that take place in the world in this period. We hope you found all the information you are interested in.