Complex sentences with subordinate circumstantial: examples from the literature, table

In Russian, sentences are divided into simple and complex. Their difference lies in the fact that simple have one grammatical basis, in complex they can be two or more. In syntactic constructions consisting of several parts, one of the three types of connection can be used: the writing, the union or the subordinate. Complicated sentences with subordinate circumstantial (9th grade) are the most extensive topic due to the number of values of the dependent part from the main one.

The concept of compound sentences

A syntactic structure in which one part is dependent on another is called complex. It always has the main (from which the question is posed) and the subordinate part. Proposals that are part of such a structure are joined by subordinate unions or allied words, for example:

1. The boy understood (what?) That his deception was discovered (the main part - the boy understood, to which the appendage was attached with the help of the subordinate "what").
2. What is the second in Rome, it is better to be the first in the province (under what condition?) (The main suggestion - it is better to be the first in the province - is connected with the dependent union "than").
3. The wind blew from the north (which?), Which forced everyone to button up their jackets (the main sentence - the wind blew from the north - is connected with the subordinate union word "which").

Depending on the way in which parts of the compound sentence are joined, they are divided into 4 types:

• With an explanatory clause with the help of unions to what, how, if ( I could hear the squeaking of the gate );
• With definitive clauses attached to allied words of which, which, whose, what, where and others ( I bought a car, which I had long dreamed of );
• With a subordinate clause with the use of allied words, why, why, why and what (in the evenings my mother bathed her son, after which she always read a fairy tale to him );
• Complex sentences with subordinate circumstantial ( We climbed to the observation deck, from where the city was most visible ).

The last type of syntactic constructions is divided into types according to their meaning.

Types of additional circumstantial

In complex sentences, the dependent part that answers the questions inherent in the circumstances is called. Below are presented complex sentences with subordinate circumstantial. The table summarizes all of their types:

Complicated sentences with subordinate circumstantial are joined by alliances and allied words, depending on the meaning they define.

Appendages and degrees of action

This kind of compound sentences in its dependent part gives an explanation of how the action is performed or indicates the degree of quality of the feature of the subject, which is being discussed in the main.

In such syntactic constructions, the subordinate proposal poses questions: "how?", "How?", "How much?", "To what extent?" And others. The dependent part correlates:

• With the verb with the word "so" in the main sentence (the Northern Lights shone like that?), As if someone lit thousands of colored candles in the sky );

• With a full adjective with the word "such" (The evening was so wonderful (to what extent?) That no one wanted to return to the stuffy rooms) ;
• With a complete adjective with a noun and the word "such" ( such a strange impression was created (to what extent?), As if they had known each other for many years ).

A complex subordinate clause with an adverbial circumstantial mode of action is always constructed so that the main part stands before the dependent. If you swap them, a different value is formed. For example:

1. The snow was so bright (to what extent?), That the eyes began to water after a few minutes of being on the street.
2. Eyes started to water after a few minutes of being on the street (for what reason?), Because the snow was so bright.

Adjacent Time

When the dependent part in a complex syntactic construction indicates when an event occurred, then this is a complex sentence with an adverbial circumstantial time. At the same time, the dependent part does not refer to a separate concept, but to all the main one, and it gives answers to the questions "when?", "How long?", "How long?", "Since when?"

They are connected by means of temporary unions "when", "as soon as", "hardly", "until", "as long as", "since" and others. In this case, the main sentence can contain words that have a time value, for example "then", "after", "until then", etc. For example, complex sentences with subordinate circumstantial references:

1. On that day (when?), When I took this decision, someone crashed me on the shoulder at the Criterion bar (A. Conan Doyle).
2. And now sit here for a while (for how long?), While I run off to have a snack (J. Simenon).

In similar syntactic constructions complex unions can be used, which are separated by a comma into two parts. At the same time, one of them is in the main sentence as a demonstrative word, and the second is in the subordinate in the form of an alliance. ( It's now been 30 years since he left his hometown ).

In the event that the index word is missing, the dependent part may be both before and after the main one, but in two cases it is fixed:

1. If complex sentences with subordinate circumstantial unions use "how", "when suddenly", then they are after the main ( Lunch was already coming to an end, when another guest arrived ).
2. If double alliances are used, such as "when ... then", "just ... how", "when .... Then. " In this case, the subordinate is in front of the main part, and the second fragment of the double union can be omitted ( When the first snow falls, the flock will move to the south ).

In other cases, the place of the subordinate may change, without affecting the meaning of the sentence.

Appointments

A complex sentence with a subordinate circumstantial (examples below) may indicate the place of action or its direction. It answers the questions "where?", "Where?", "Where?" And refers to a particular word in the main part that can be expressed in the dialect (there, there, from there, everywhere, everywhere, and others).

1. Everywhere (where exactly?), Wherever you look, there was water.
2. I come from there (from where?), Where I never knew poverty.

Link the complex sentence with the subordinate circumstantial place allied words "where?", "Where?", "Where?" The dependent part in similar syntactic constructions is after the word being defined.

Adequate conditions

Complicated sentences with subordinate circumstantial conditions give an answer to the questions "under what conditions?", "In which case?" Such syntactic constructions denote the conditions under which the actions called in the main part are performed. In them, the dependent sentence can refer both to the main part and to the individual predicate, and to join with the help of the unions "if", "how" (in the definition of "if"), "if", "stake" and "when" (in The "if" role).

Complex sentences with subordinate circumstantial (examples below confirm this) the conditions can be as before the main, and after it:

1. If you so want, be according to this (on what condition?).
2. You can get a chance to win the lottery (in which case?), If you buy tickets regularly.
3. If you buy tickets regularly, you can win in the lottery (the content of the offer has not changed from the permutation).

Often, similar syntactic constructions use unions consisting of two parts: "if ... then", "if .... So "," if .... Then ( if tomorrow it rains, then we will not follow the mushrooms ).

Adjacent goal

Complex sentences with subordinate goals indicate the purpose for which the action indicated in its main part is performed. They give answers to the questions "why?", "For what purpose?", "For what?"

Parts of such a syntactic structure are joined by the unions "in order", "in order", "in order to", "only", "then to" and others, for example:

1. To get there faster, he accelerated the steps (for what purpose?).
2. In order to be useful to people, you need to work hard on yourself (for what?).
3. I said this for (why?) To annoy my father.

Complex unions can be divided, then a comma stands between them. One part remains in the main sentence, and the union "to" - in the dependent.

Adequate reason

Complicated sentences with subordinate circumstantial reasons indicate the basis of what is said in the main part. The dependent proposal is fully relevant to the main one and answers questions "for what reason?", "Why?", "Why?" And joins the unions "because", "good", "because", "for", "because" "And others, for example:

1. Thanks to the fact that we rallied, the rivals could not defeat us (for what reason?).
2. She was sad (why?), Because the autumn brought rain and cold.
3. We decided to make a halt (why?), Because they walked six hours in a row.

The sentence sentence in similar syntactic constructions usually stands after the main one.

Corollary effect

In complex sentences with similar clauses, the conclusion is drawn, which is made according to the content of the main part. It answers the question "what happened because of this?" The dependent fragment joins the main union "so" and always goes after it, for example:

1. The heat intensified (what happened because of this?), So I had to look for shelter.
2. The girl cried (what happened because of this?), So I had to give in to her request.

One should not confuse this kind of constructions with subordinate degrees and measures that use the adverb "so" and the "what" union. ( For summer he was so sunburned that his hair seemed white ).

Conventional assignment

Complex sentences with these subordinates give explanations for events that occurred in spite of what was said in the main part.

They answer the questions "in spite of what?", "Contrary to what?" And join the main part:

• Unions "though," "at least ... but", "despite what", "let", "let it" ( There were large puddles on the street, although it rained yesterday );
• Union words with a particle "no" - "no matter how," "no matter how much" "so that neither." ( No matter how much the grandfather made a rocking chair, it turned out to be hysterical) .

Thus, subordinate concessions indicate why the action did not work.