Common proposals, their features

All sentences in Russian are built according to a certain type, depending on the presence / absence of certain elements, the meaning or design of the smallest communicative unit.

So, for example, if you analyze the proposal in terms of the purpose of the statement, you can see three types:

• Narrative containing information (I went to school.)

• Interrogative (Will you go to college?)

• Incentive (Go to classes.)

Regardless of the purpose of the statement, the sentence may have other characteristics. For example, by intonation, one design can be either non-exclamatory (I have come.) Or an exclamation (I have come!).

If we consider the basis of the sentence, then we can single out one-part structures (with one main term) or two-part constructions (with a complete base) - Light. Think about your actions. Silence. (One-part). I like summer very much. (Two-part).

Finally, this syntactic can be considered from the point of view of the presence or absence of secondary members.

Common proposals consist of a grammatical basis and secondary members. Secondary are additions, circumstances, definitions. However, in order for a proposal to be widespread, the "complete set" of secondary members is not needed, but at least one of them is sufficient. (In the morning, the school teachers are preparing for the lessons.) The notebook is on the table. A new employee has come in. I'll be back in the morning). All of these examples are common sentences with a different "set" of secondary members.

Accordingly, those structures that have no other members, except the grammatical basis - Silence, are considered to be unreported. It's brightening. The city wakes up.

From all that has been said above, one can conclude: unreasonable and widespread sentences can be different in purpose of utterance, intonational coloring. (Bring the book, please do not cry.) Do you cry? How can you ?!)

Very often students make a gross mistake by using the phrase "simple common sentence". This can not be said, because the prevalence / non-prevalence category refers only to a simple sentence. If it is a complex issue, then it is necessary to speak separately about each part of it. Let us give an example.

It lights up, and the ice covering the puddles begins to melt.

This offer :

• Narrative (by the purpose of the utterance);

• Non-exclamatory (by intonation);

• Complex (by the number of parts or grammatical bases);

• Compound because its parts are connected by a constructive connecting union, indicating that the action of the parts occurs simultaneously;

• The first part ("Light") is a simple one-piece unspoken sentence;

• The second part is a simple, two-part, distributed proposal.

Secondary members may refer to any member of the proposal. Their task - to expand, clarify or clarify the meaning - the guest entered the room. The new guest entered timidly into the crowded room.

Analyzing the proposal, one should not lose sight of the fact that the categories of prevalence or non-prevalence are accepted in school grammar. In academic Russian these signs are studied more deeply, that the school program does not take into account. Therefore, sometimes it is possible to misinterpret the concept of "widespread and unspoken proposals". For example, from the point of view of the school curriculum, referrals or plug-in structures are not members of the proposal, therefore, they can not distribute it. Therefore, the design of "Vanya, let's go!" Will be considered a simple, one-part, unreasonable proposal, complicated by treatment. From the point of view of some linguists, the independent word form ("Vanya"), introduced into the construction, allows us to consider the proposal as widespread.