Bioresonance diagnosis - reviews are mixed

One of the most common methods of examining the body in modern alternative medicine, which provokes heated debate, is bioresonance diagnostics. Reviews of doctors and patients about this procedure are distinguished by the prevalence of negative opinions. Positive, despite the fact that there are fewer, successfully supplement the picture of the attitude of consumers to this diagnostic invention.

It should be noted that most of the reviews are based on the personal experience of patients and doctors, which can not be verified. This raises doubts about the reliability of estimates, especially in the case of absolutely positive responses without an analysis of the failed aspects of the method.

For these reasons, bioresonance diagnostics (BRD) should at least be discussed comprehensively. It is important that both its defenders and opponents can speak.

In this article, an attempt is made to present both points of view to the reader.

Defenders of BRD talk about the method

Bioresonance research is a tool for accurate diagnosis. It helps the doctor to solve a number of problems:

• The root cause of the patient's poor health;
• Detection of infectious foci in the body and clarification of their features;
• The detection of all discernable functional abnormalities and painful reactions that marked the tissues and organs:
  - degenerative;
  - autoimmune diseases;
  - allergic;
• Determination of possible ways of their elimination.

Every living organism - a fungus, a bacterium, a virus, as well as a cell and tissue of any human organ, emits electromagnetic oscillations whose spectrum is characteristic only of a given biological object. In this case, in the normal and painful state of each biological unit, these spectra differ significantly.

To diagnose, it is necessary to catch painful spectra of oscillations through a biologically active point (usually on a hand or on fingers). For this purpose, pathological samples of spectra for each organ, as well as for pathogens, are sent to the body. Outgoing from the body signals of disease (if any) resonate with the incoming, and then the pathology is recorded.

The basis for the treatment of electromagnetic interference is carefully conducted bioresonance diagnostics. Feedback on treatment, in its positive part, refers to diseases that are mostly psychosomatic. These are, for example, allergic reactions, skin diseases, etc. This suggests that for the success of the treatment the patient must be suggestible in order to believe what the doctor tells him. When preparing doctors for DBD and BRT, they are trained to psychological influence on the patient in order to convince him of successful diagnosis and treatment.

The treatment itself can be carried out in two different ways: endogenous and exogenous .

When endogenous treatment, the diagnostic device reads the electromagnetic oscillations of the body. Then the apparatus separates the signals of normal states and painful ones and sends them back. In this case, "health signals" are amplified, and "disease signals" are minimized, i.e. suppressed. The body resonates on "healthy" frequencies and starts working on them.

In the exogenous method, a special generator of weak signals is used, which are translated into the body. Their frequency is chosen in such a way as to cause a strong protective response. In this case, the body's mode of operation is reconstructed into a resonant "frequency of health".

Bioresonance diagnostics of parasites in the body is actively promoted. The authors of the technique believe that parasitizing worms, lamblia, etc., can be found even at the stage of their inception. In particular, this is largely due to bioresonance diagnostics. The doctors' comments, however, do not confirm the guarantee of early detection of parasites.

Opponents of the BRD criticize the method

Not everyone seems to be good at bioresonance diagnostics. Comments that express a negative opinion of her, sound sharp criticism. In order to preserve the objectivity of the content in this article, it is necessary to give a diagram of these objections.

• In physiological studies, including the newest and the most progressive, the very existence of bioresonance is not confirmed.
• There are no serious clinical studies proving the effectiveness of DBB and BRT. Official science has not even confirmed their belonging to medicine.
• Very many devices, recommended by inventors for BRD, do not create the effect of bioresonance as such.
• The only confirmed result of exposure to devices for BRD and BRT is a short effect of temporary anesthesia. In all other cases, they do not correspond to any properties declared by the authors.
• Unipolar electricity, which affects the patient with BRT, causes a cellular mutation. The latter leads directly to oncological diseases.

Bioresonance diagnostics of the body is a poorly researched area of alternative medicine. It is quite obvious that its creators do not know everything about the nature and application of this method. It remains to be hoped that there will be serious research about the possibilities of integrating this technique into classical medicine.

At the same time, even now people, disillusioned with traditional diagnostics and treatment, have the opportunity to make an alternative choice. If only he was not dangerous.