Who called to gnaw granite science? Phraseology "gnaw granite science" and its meaning

The symbol of death among the flowering of life. Knowledge of the world and science environment is usually youth. It is cheerful and reckless everywhere and everywhere. All the centuries-old student folklore testifies to that. Students live by the future, because they are young and beautiful. Wine and girls are the main themes of their songs, and only somewhere on the periphery of their work glimpses of ironic tirades about the hard work on mastering the knowledge that has accumulated humanity. So where did the granite - the symbol of inertia and death - appear in their blossoming environment? Who called to gnaw granite science?

The truth is different - this symbol is colored by the creativity of students in ironic, reckless tones, but, nevertheless, it ground and dead what it thirsts to rejoice and make happy by the joy of the whole world.

Socrates and Ancient Greek Academies

It is believed that the systematic training of young people was introduced into the ancient Greek culture by the unsystematic sage Socrates. The philosopher of the barrel spoke about this in the sense that Socrates's free mind makes cells in the green gardens of the Academy for young minds. If he had, in modern terms, had a lesser authority, then he would have had the right to teach. And so the youth will look into his mouth. And the young flexible sprouts will turn into stone under the old look of Socrates.

Who called for gnawing granite science, Socrates?

No, this will not happen, - Socrates objects, - because for me the disciples are not vessels, but torches. I do not fill them, but I light them up.

And indeed, from the Socratic Academy grew violent gardens of philosophy throughout the ancient world. Nowhere is there any inertia. The Stoics, the Sophists, the Epicureans, the materialists, the idealists ... Over the next 2.5 thousand years, there have been as many philosophies in philosophy as from the Socratic Academy. So none of the ancient Greek philosophers could call on the granite of science to gnaw.

It seems that until the 18th century, before Goethe's birth, world philosophy only picked up the crumbs of wisdom after the feast of philosophers of the ancient world. The great Aristotle, chosen by the occasional punching of the finger of Saint Constantine among the assembly of great philosophers, is appointed to be a pillar and cornerstone of the church wisdom about a world that is not a religion. The Unfortunate Aristotle. He would never have agreed to such a role. His philosophy trembles with life. His philosophy - these are the principles, but not the unshakable canons.

Confucius

At the other end of the world, the middle management official of the great power of the ancient world comprehends life and worldly wisdom. And strangely, the simplest and most obvious truths, systematized by the sage, become a powerful philosophy that accommodates, if not all, much. Maybe this ancient Chinese called for gnawing a granite of science, meaning, putting into his words something that is not entirely clear to us today? No, everything that was written to him a long time ago is understandable today with utter clarity. No wonder his many sayings became proverbs.

But Confucius argued that man can not give eternal laws, because he must fulfill the eternal canons. Only going beyond the end, he creates the laws to master the new and admit to him the eternal canons. Then human laws die.

This idea echoes Goethe's thought: "Dead theories, my friend, are dead, and the tree of life is eternal" The stone can not so grow through the lumps of centuries. Only the living will sprout.

Dogmatism. Theology and Scholasticism

Why did St. Constantine gather about half a thousand shepherds (pastors) of Christian flocks (flock) in the city of Nicaea in 325? And in order to remove all the contradictions from the doctrine of Christ and God, because he was going to make Christianity the state religion. He needed a cornerstone for building a powerful empire and he was created by him. And flew to the fires of more than 30 Gospels, dozens of revelations, from the teachings of the Gnostics about the knowledge of the world remained crumbs. Even the Gospel of John, the beloved disciple of Christ, fell into the Bible only in 415 AD. And his revelation is even later. From the revelation of Peter himself there are two useless chapters.

Tertullian says that the construction of the eternal stone of the doctrine of truth began. God's laws are strict and the violence of colors is inappropriate. And through a couple of centuries, including those words, was ranked among the fathers of the church. He did not give birth to a granite of science - a phraseology, because he considered all sciences unnecessary. And the other phraseology of the other father of the church - I believe, because it is absurd, and completely pulled out the very notion of "science" from the everyday life of cognitive youth. Scholasticism has become a space, and theology is the granite walls of the building, to which students were introduced in the Middle Ages.

Here one would have to look for someone who called to bite granite science first, if the very word "science" was not perceived as a rebellion against the building of faith. When in our time a person reads ancient works on scholasticism and theology, he is not bewildered for two reasons:

1. Why did people write a lot of words, when much shorter and more clearly written in the same Bible?
2. Why their works are so gloomy, why they do not have a poppy seed of life, when life itself is rampant in the Gospels themselves.

These useless treatises are similar to the modern compilation of many people from philosophy with titles. The writings of the ancient Greek philosophers are understandable and interesting today. Probably at that time there was a prejudice that the intelligent should be incomprehensible, although in reality it is just the opposite - only the intelligible is intelligent.

Overcoming

The Middle Ages ended in rebirth. Science ceased to be a battered girl and turned into a princess, who is destined to become a queen in her time. True, for this, many stepped into the fire. Together with science and art, life returned to human society. Galileo does not offer his students to bite into the rock of science, but carries them along with them to the top of the Leaning Tower to conduct the first physical experiment. He thereby laid down the living, not the dead, foundations of science for the Newtons, Lomonosovs and Maxwells. Artists and sculptors laid the foundations of optics, without even knowing about her future birth. And they were amazed that 1500 years before they had already painted this way, they already did so.

Who called to gnaw granite science?

The answer to this question is far from necessary. Those who began to sculpt a new stone system of dogmas are Marxists. But science in this phrase is intertwined only because it has already become queen. The works of the founders of the new scholasticism can not be read, because nothing is intelligible. Of them, the same philosophers as the old women of the ballerina. Specifically, that something needs to be gnawed, Trotsky said, and thereby gave out what their Marxist-Leninist-Trotsky-Stalinist theory represents. An indigestible stone, which you need to gnaw at young. And then, whether the benefits of living on Earth will benefit from this - they were not interested. And the stone was the emblem of death and stagnation, so this symbol remained.

Irony

Not in one Belgorod is there a monument to the granite of science. However, it is not so important who called to gnaw granite science. The main thing is said to be vital and it is clear that with its terrible past humanity is saying good-bye cheerfully. This joy and express ironic numerous monuments of dead stagnation. They, with their strict contours and artistry, resemble the same famous for all the world and the same exalted creation of Malevich - "The Black Square".