What is a fee? The meaning, interpretation and examples

What is the fee, we think, know almost everything, and certainly they want to receive it all their life. Today we will understand the meaning of the word, its synonyms and examples. The topic is actually quite fascinating.

Value

As always, the explanatory dictionary does not allow us to engage in meaningfulness and asks to stick to the official version. So: "The fee is a reward for people of free professions."

Here is their list:

• doctor;
• interpreter;
• writer;
• photographer;
• artist;
• artist;
• architect;
• programmer;
• Lawyer, lawyer.

Probably, they are now much larger, but for the sake of this example, enough of these. Adjective "free" are quoted, because all working people depend on demand and offers, the demand for their work in the market. Freedom only in that, as a rule, people of free professions do not depend on the schedule (here the local doctor will be surprised). Yes, there are some surprises on the list, but the list of professions that are fed by fees can vary from country to country.

In Europe and America, doctors are really wealthy and free. We, too, no one prevents a person from opening a clinic, but no one helps. Okay, let's leave this. We turn to analogues, because it is already clear in general terms the meaning of the word "fee".

Synonyms

The fee is a foreign and attractive word, but it is possible to destroy this magic quite easily if you quote words and phrases that are intended to take the place of the object of research:

• pay;
• Payment by piece-rate;
• Reward;
• cost of services.

When synonyms for the word "fee" appeared before us, it already does not seem so attractive. Especially the Russian person oppresses the phrase "payment by piece", because in this job you can not just sit and do nothing. If the result is absent, there will be no food or other benefits of civilization: light or water.

Salary vs fee

After the main parameters of the problem have been solved and it became clear what the fee is, it is necessary to answer a question that probably excites many: what is better - to work and have a salary and advance or move from project to project and "receive a fee all my life". The dilemma is not as simple as it seems. And the point is not the amount of wages, but what a person wants and what he is used to.

Those who love stability, are unlikely to agree to a free professional flight, when it is not known what will happen tomorrow. Of course, there are freelancers (here the word is taken in a broad sense) of a global scale, for example television actors, actors who usually have short-term contracts for certain works. When the agreement has expired and the parties have no complaints, they are forgiven to future cooperation.

People who are not involved in the process think: "How wonderful it is to entertain people and live with dignity, not like getting up at 7 am every day, go to the office and sit there. It is not known, why and to whom it is needed? "But to invite them to give up places, they will most likely refuse. Even if they know perfectly well what a fee is.

Character and profession

Because a person chooses a profession almost unconsciously, relying on values, character traits, inclinations, abilities and that fundamental goal that even he himself does not realize until the end. But it is she who leads him to a comfortable existence.

What is a fee and is it different from the salary? Yes, and not only form, but also essential. Some people want piecework pay, and others - a stable salary. Everyone has his own preferences, and the provisions of the free-lance shooter and full-time employee are full of pluses and minuses.

Life is a series of projects, and the people in it are mercenaries

The modern world is changing quite rapidly. The notion of "stability" increasingly evokes nostalgic memories of the Soviet Union, when a man came to the plant at 20 years and went to 60. Life was simple and understandable and measured by certain achievements in the form of a color TV, the apartment received - the reader himself is able to continue the series.

Now life is different. It presupposes a constant movement, as Aristotle bequeathed. The term "project" replaces the definition of "work". A person feels the instability of his situation, even if he has an entirely ordinary specialty. All people are seized with a thirst that can be called "where to earn money?".

Therefore, the concept of "fee" is not so far from an ordinary citizen, as is commonly thought. The concepts of "shabashka" and "hack-work" are well known to all of us, and in fact such things are paid by piece, catch?

The interpretation of the word "fee" is almost over, we just have to eat sweet.

Dessert: the largest royalties in the history of cinema

Finally we want to make the heart of everyone read. Do not think that we recruit people into actors, these are just figures. And here, too, will need a list (we will limit ourselves to the top five):

1. Keanu Reeves received $ 126 million for his participation in the movie "The Matrix Reloaded".
2. Bruce Willis for a fantastic and mysterious role in the "Sixth Sense" earned 100-120 million dollars.
3. Tandem G. Wells and T. Cruz gave the last $ 100 million, and the viewer - the film "War of the Worlds."
4. Sandra Bullock requested and received for participation in the film "Gravitation" 77 million dollars.
5. And closes the top five inimitable Keanu Reeves with a salary of 76 million dollars for the movie "The Matrix: Revolution."

And two more shocking facts from the sphere of foreign cinema. According to rumors, Cruz received a percentage of the profits from the movie, for which he had already paid 100 million, and the total income was 1.5 billion. If the reader has somewhere nearby a typewriter, then even she has already broken down, probably.

Believe it or not, Sean Connery refused to participate in Peter Jackson's landmark epic film The Lord of the Rings and lost $ 1.1 billion on it. Interestingly, the charming actor regrets? Played him, of course, offered Gandalf.