The image of Pugachev in Esenin's poem "Pugachev". Evaluation of the poem by critics

Consider the image of Pugachev in Esenin's poem "Pugachev." This poem is addressed to a difficult period in the history of Russia. Sergei Yesenin The October Revolution did not take right away. He saw in it not only a step forward, to a new world, but also death, hunger, devastation. The poet was tormented by this contradiction. In addition, he realized that in the villages there is a fading of life.

His thoughts, doubts, his poetic riot Sergei Alexandrovich expressed in a poem called "Pugachev." Quite a few details of the peasant war make up its content. Yesenin ("Pugachev" - a work that was published in 1921) did not set itself the task of reconstructing history. Let us note that in the action of this poem Sergey Alexandrovich reflected more realities of his modernity than those inherent in the time in which Emelyan lived.

This work for Yesenin was turning. The theme of the people's struggle began for him precisely with him, from the spiritual impulse depicted in him. This poem is epic, consisting of lyrical monologues.

Why did the poet turn to the image of Emelian Pugachev?

The image of Pugachev in Esenin's poem "Pugachev" is central. Why did the poet need to turn to him? Yesenin hoped that the October Revolution would magnify Russia , that it would make our country strong. Sergei Alexandrovich dreamed of Inonia - a peasant paradise. However, he did not advance, and yet the question of where the fate of all events bears us all, Esenin worried more and more. Inonia turned into an unattainable dream. Therefore, he turned, worried about the future of peasant Russia, to such a historical figure as Emelyan Pugachev and Yesenin. After all, Emelyan tried to build this peasant paradise by force.

The image of Pugachev in Esenin: the main features

The poem was created by the author from March to August 1921. In the same year, her reading was performed at the Meyerhold Theater. However, the production did not materialize.

At Yesenin the image of Pugachev is romanticized. Sergei Alexandrovich does not complicate his poem with other characters, even insignificant ones. Only the image of Pugachev in Esenin's poem "Pugachev" is shown in development. According to the author's remark, in addition to Emelyan, almost no one should repeat himself in the tragedy. New faces must be in every scene. This puts forward the main role of Pugachev and gives more movement.

Emelian is the person whom the people were waiting for. Yesenin shows his hero even when the riot was only brewing, and after the protagonist announced that he was a king. The image of Pugachev in Esenin's poem "Pugachev" is quite complex. Emelyan is shown contradictory. In his image, cruelty is combined with credulity. There is an impression, based on the attitude of this hero to his subordinates, that they are his servants, who are obliged to carry out his orders.

On the election, the importance of Pugachev says Hlopusha, a Ural convict who was sent to Emelian to kill him, but came to him as a friend. Like the protagonist of the work, Khlopusha believes that a war must be waged wisely, it is necessary to be filled with the mind, and not just with anger.

Reflection of author's position and attitude in the image of Emelian

Continuing to describe the image of Pugachev from Yesenin, we note that Emelyan is not a supporter of merciless and spontaneous rebellion. His dreams are dreams of a new world, which Yesenin himself shared. In the full dramatic tension of the finale, we see a hero loyal to his comrades-in-arms. And we feel his tragedy and loneliness as never before.

The final monologue of the main character, Sergei Alexandrovich, read to Maxim Gorky, and excited the latter to a spasm in his throat. The state of the poet is reflected in his tearing. Yesenin did not take root in the city, but he already became a stranger in the countryside. He felt his loneliness especially when he returned from a trip abroad.

Evaluation of the poem by critics

The reaction to this poem of contemporaries was ambiguous. N. Osinsky, for example, believed that the poet portrayed the "pathos of the rebellious elements," the current from Emelian Pugachev to the present day. The poem as a whole was considered unsuccessful.

In the work reflected the peculiarities of style, peculiar to imagism, which at that time was fond of Sergei Alexandrovich. An unaccustomed system of images, a mixture of different layers of vocabulary, causing metaphors - all this is characteristic of this work. The author was reproached that Pugachev's speech was subjected to imitation. It has been noticed by some critics that the work has brilliant monologues. Therefore, they called it a heroic drama in verse.

Artistic innovation of Yesenin

Yesenin, saying that rebellion is doomed, relies in its opinion that the Russian peasants are inert. They are not able to act decisively. The poet does not try to recreate the details of history, to show the confrontation of the camps, although historical materials were thoroughly studied by him. The main question for Yesenin is whether the peasants can accept the revolution. The poet not through the facts, but through lyrical perception gives history, and this is his artistic innovation.