Cost of goods

1. In the modern
To economic science, the exchange ratio of commodities is called "exchange
Cost ". And this cost is contrasted with that which, allegedly, exists in
Each of the individual goods and determines the exchange proportions. And, different
Economic schools in this, absolute
In their size, value, they see a different filling. Thus, supporters of labor
Theories of value argue that this value is work (socially necessary),
Fans of the theory of utility - what is the ability of the goods to satisfy
Human needs. Other directions of economic thought are used for
Filling this mythical value and energy, and information, and other entities
Of a different kind.

The proposed work of the reader states that there is one
And only one form of value - exchange,
Correlative. And all the others are fictions necessary to explain
Fluctuations in exchange rates. And in these others there is absolutely no
Necessity. For these oscillations are explained differently, without the introduction of a multiple
Number of different values. Therefore, there is no need for the word "value"
To apply the epithet "exchange". And you should call it simply "value." Realizing
It is the relative value. That is, the quantitative
The ratio of goods that develops in the process of exchanging them for each other.

In view of what has been said, the theory presented in this work is called
"Correlative". In contrast to all those in which value is understood
As an absolute value. And which could be called "absolute theories
Cost ".

2. The language of the theory, how much
It was possible, close to popular science. Since the author does not
Sets itself the goal of obtaining some scientific regalia and titles. A concerned
In one - in the widest possible dissemination of correct ideas about
Cost. For to endure the dominance of delusions in this area, there are already no forces.

The same goes for the structure of the composition. It is adopted linear, without
Allocation of the second and third level of rubrication. Because the work is not great. AND
The subordination of its portions is not difficult to see independently.

3. This version of the theory
Is the third in a row. The first was expounded with pure formal-mathematical
Positions; The second arose when the first movement to the essence of value appeared. A
This became possible when this essence was fully disclosed. God willing,
That in full.

____________________

* Usually use the word
"proportion". But it is inconvenient because it has two meanings: "the ratio"
And "equality of two relations".

Full article
For reading on the web is located at: http://sovet14.narod.ru/STS.3V/STS.3V.htm

Archive of the whole theory
One file in DOC format: http://sovet14.narod.ru/STS.3V/STS.3V_Word.rar