A. Griboyedov "Woe from Wit". An analysis of Chatsky's monologue "Who are the judges?"

The comedy "Woe from Wit" is the most famous work of Alexander Griboyedov. In it he opened many interesting and important topics, gave an assessment to his contemporaries. Himself the author associates with the main character - Alexander Chatsky, it is in his lines that the writer's thoughts sound. The main ideas most often sound in the monologues of the character. They play a very large role in the ideological sense of the comedy. In the whole work six monologues are presented, and each of them on the new side characterizes the hero and develops the plot.

One sane person for 25 fools

Analysis Chatsky monologue "A judge who?" Shows how this passage differs from the usual speeches of the characters. The statement of the main character goes far beyond the situation in which it turned out, and it is intended not for the "Famous" society, but for the reader. This monologue is almost the most important in the whole work, because it expresses the development of social conflict, and the ideological meaning of the whole comedy appears.

The writer created a certain speech situation in which this passage is explained from the psychological point of view as a "counterblow". But the analysis of Chatsky's monologue, "Who are the judges," says that he is much "broader" in his ideological and artistic role. Alexander Andreevich could confine himself to caustic remarks and fight off his opponents. CHATSKY wished to deliver a detailed, accusatory speech. "And who are the judges?" - asks the main character of Skalozub and Famusov, but his remark is mostly concerned not with them, but with the whole "Famousov society".

"Laughter through tears"

The only reasonable person in the whole work is one Alexander Andreevich, on all sides he is surrounded by fools, and this is the trouble of the main character. An analysis of Chatsky's monologue "Who are the judges?" Shows that Alexander Andreevich can not find a common language, not with individuals, but with the entire conservative society. The protagonist's remarks do not make him ridiculous, the comic situation, rather, creates Skalozub by his reaction to Chatsky's answer. The reader sympathizes with Alexander Andreevich, in this case the comedy already turns into drama.

Opposition to society

Analyzing the monologue of Chatsky speaks about how difficult it is for a person to get accustomed to a society in which other moods and ideas reign. Griboedov in his comedy warned readers about the changes that have occurred in the circles of the Decembrists. If before freethinkers could calmly speak with their speeches at balls, now the reaction of conservative society has intensified. Decembrists conspire, rebuild the activities of societies in accordance with the new rules.

An analysis of Chatsky's monologue "Who are the judges?" Shows that such a speech could only be pronounced at secret meetings of secret societies in the circle of like-minded people, and not in the master's living room. Unfortunately, Alexander Andreevich does not know about this, since he has traveled the last few years and stayed far from his homeland. He does not know the moods that prevail in society, he does not know about the reaction of the authorities and the environment to such bold speeches, so he utters his monologue to fools who do not want, and can not understand him.