Socionics is ... Socionics: relationship table

For a long time, a term such as socionics has appeared. This is not a science, but a special classification of personality types, as well as the relationships that develop between them. It was founded in the seventies of the last century by such a sociologist as Ausra Augustinavichyute. And this typology caused many genuine interest. So, it is necessary to tell about this concept in a simple and understandable language and understand its principles.

Definition

So, what is socionics, this is understandable. Now we need to expand this term in more detail.

The purpose of this concept is that every person can find out his individual socionic type and, on the basis of the result and the read characteristics (usually with some guidelines for a certain path, advice) choose a way of self-realization.

Many critics and scientists say that socionics is already an independent discipline that does not belong to psychology, but goes far beyond it. You can say otherwise. Socionics is a unique and unique science that lies where informatics, sociology and psychology intersect.

Application of the discipline

Socionics is not only a discipline that has developed socionic types. It is also a science that has found its application in certain fields of activity. For example, in Russia, a socionic test is often conducted when recruiting staff. It also happens that methods based on the principles of this discipline are applied in pedagogy. Professional orientation, configuration and formation of surgical teams of "first aid" - in this she also found its application.

Even sociology is used in linguistics. Based on its principles, the system typology of the language personality is clarified . At the same time, linguosociological types are isolated and analyzed. But this is a completely different "industry".

And, of course, politics. In this important field of activity, this concept has already started to be used.

Mental functions

Socionics is an unusual test. It may seem simple (although, in fact, so it is), but in order to make it so, scientists conducted various experiments and studied human thinking.

Types of personality are identified on the basis of such characteristics as intuition, sensation, feeling and thinking. And they have their own definition. So, for example, thinking is a function that brings information and data into a concrete conceptual connection. Feeling is characterized slightly differently. It gives this content a certain value. This refers to the moral component. That is, a person received information (thinking), processed it and made a conclusion - it's bad or good, beautiful / ugly, mean / honest, etc. This is feelings.

Now the feeling. A synonym for the word "perception". Man, determining the conclusion (as mentioned above), guided by the sensations.

And the last is intuition. The function by which a person perceives something without thinking. You can say unconsciously. It's just that he thinks so.

Based on these functions, or rather on how they are combined in the consciousness of a particular person and in what quantities, and the socionic type is determined.

"Don Quixote", "Dumas", "Hugo" and "Robespierre"

These are the first four types that I would like to talk about. There are 16 in total.

So, "Don Quixote" (he is also the "Seeker"). Related to this type of people are characterized as intuitive-logical extraverts. Excellent organizers, individuals who try to be useful, fans of thrill, in need of constant excitement and always rushing for prospects.

"Dumas", he is also "Mediator". These people are sensory-ethical introverts. They are friendly, they like art and nature, they are attentive and caring, they rarely refuse, they love to help and do not like to stand out from the crowd. Unfortunately, these kind and sincere people are rare today. This has already proved socionics. The table of relations shows that the ideal pair (dual) for such people is "Don Quixote", which was described above. Indeed, according to the characteristics, they perfectly complement each other.

"Hugo" and "Robespierre" - they are "Enthusiast" and "Analyst". Ethical-sensory extrovert and logical-intuitive introvert. Perfectly complement each other from a psychological point of view. A fiery, emotional, indefatigable lover of order and a rational fighter for justice with developed logic is a very colorful combination, as socionics shows. Women and men who meet in such a combination are quite interesting pairs.

"Hamlet", "Maxim", "Zhukov" and "Yesenin"

The first two types are "Mentor" and "Inspector". And they are also duals. "Hamlets" are serious and focused on their problems of personality. Socionics shows that these people can cope with anything, if they are prepared for the situation and find a solution. Clearly divide the good and evil and the bad will never undeservedly.

"Maxim Bitter" - sober realists who never change their views. At all. In addition, they are quite secretive. For them, "mine" means only "mine." They are hardy, persistent in character, sometimes even ruthless. And emotional.

"Zhukov" and "Yesenin" - this is also an interesting dual pair. "Marshals" are strong-willed and purposeful people who are interested in achieving the goal. Do not feel fear, emotions and other strong emotions. "Yesenin" is for him an ideal dual pair because precisely these individuals are fighters for emotional emancipation. Very subtly feel the rest. Romantics who pursue inspiration. A man of a socionic type "Yesenin" will become what so few hard and serious "Zhukov" lacked.

"Napoleon", "Balzac", "Jack" and "Dreiser"

This - the penultimate "quartet", which offers us socionics. The relationship table shows that these types really complement each other in full.

After all, "Napoleon" and "Balzac" - is, indeed, a unique pair. An active, energetic aesthetic and kind hearted intellectual. "Balzac" becomes an ideal pair for "Napoleon" because it needs someone at the side who would become a "second half" immediately. That is, he does not want to adapt to a partner. And in this dual pair this is quite possible.

"Jack" is a true workaholic, a romantic who loves adventure, a tireless optimist and just a person who loves life. What does socionics tell us? Relationships with "Jacks" are excellent with "Dreisers". Because they are polite, tactful people, modest, loyal, loving. In general, "Dreiser" "Jack" will necessarily want to cheer, to show a real, eventful life. As a rule, such pairs are strong.

"Stirlitz", "Dostoyevsky", "Huxley" and "Gaben"

This is the last four of socionic types. "Stirlitz" - people who can act logically and reasonably. They are assertive and do not tolerate any delays. Also "Stirlitz" - an ardent opponent of cunning, meanness and dishonest game, whatever it is. "Dostoevsky", considered an ideal socionic couple "Stirlitz", are the owners of a very sensitive and subtle soul organization. They never refuse and try to help everyone. And really, these people are able to become a good pair of "Stirlitzes" - they will be able to teach those to be more emotional and softer in situations where it is impossible to build relationships without this.

"Huxley" is a passionate enthusiast. Emotional, active, like fun companies and adventures. And still everything depends on their mood. "Gaben," his dual is a self-contained person who will not work without any purpose. They have a really beneficial relationship with Huxley. One another teaches you how to control emotions (when you need to be restrained, and when you do not have to do it), and the second one is pushing your partner to active activity.

Conclusion

So, it should be noted that each type has a detailed characteristic, and all that is described above is only briefly and for general acquaintance. And finally I would like to make a reservation that from the listed "duals" can not necessarily turn out to be love couples. Colleagues, comrades, friends - we mean in general the relationship between people! After all, "duals" are just certain couples who are ideal from the point of view of psycho-sociological complementing each other.