How did the universe appear? Theories and assumptions

How did the universe appear? This question does not cease to worry all those people who at least once looked into the night sky, sparkling with stars.

Since time immemorial, people have come up with different explanations. The easiest way was to explain the birth of the universe by Divine Providence. And although this did not explain in any way, where did God come from, the theory for a long time was considered to be the only true one.

But time was passing, and scientists decided to answer the question of how the Universe appeared.

The first scientific theory was The Big Bang Theory. Studying the starry sky, astronomer Hubble in 1929 concluded that the galaxies he observes are getting farther apart. He concluded that the universe is expanding. Arguing further, Hubble came to the conclusion that about 13.5 billion. Years ago, the dimensions of the universe were comparable to zero, and its density and temperature - with infinity. There was a Big Bang, as a result of which the time began to expand and the Universe. This theory finds its adherents today.

Some peoples have myths that the universe emerged from a destroyed cosmic egg, which was the beginning of everything. This myth echoes the theory of the "Big Bang", but, like the "divine" stories about the birth of the cosmos, does not explain in any way who created this Cosmic Egg and when.

The Big Bang theory has another explanation. According to some scientists, earlier matter, energy and time were a homogeneous, very dense bunch. As a result of the explosion, time and gravity split, the universe began to expand and fill with particles that fall into it through gravity and motion. Colliding, scattering, striking, these particles spawned neutrons and protons. They did not change their essence for a while, but when the temperature of the universe began to drop, the elementary particles began to "stick together" and form chemical elements: lithium, helium, hydrogen.

However, a number of scientists appeared who are not satisfied with the notion of an "expanding Universe". They invented and have almost proved a new theory. She denies the Big Bang.

On the question of how the universe came into being, they respond like this: in the existing cosmic world, there are always invisible and imperceptible subtle super-sensitive membranes. Interacting in the process of collision, they form a lot of microparticles. Once, having collided and getting closer as much as possible, these membranes closed and formed our Universe.

But this theory does not suit all astronomers and historians. There is another interesting hypothesis explaining how the universe appeared. According to her, the Cosmos is nothing but another splash that has occurred in the constantly ongoing process. When the splash ends, the Earth and its environment will come to an end.

In the opinion of the scientist AD Linde, the Universe was born as a result of the interaction of electric forces, gradually passing several phase transitions. He and some other scientists are convinced that the universe is the result of the interaction of light (photons) and heavy (boson) elements. It seems that the andron collider partially confirms their assumptions.

Which theory is correct? While no one knows for sure. Perhaps, the time will come, and we will reliably establish how the universe appeared. In the meantime, we have time to dream, invent, explore, analyze.