Browser comparison: which is better

In the Internet age the browser is the most important thing installed on the computer. That is why it is worth paying special attention to this component of the system. If the browser is good, then Internet surfing will be simple and enjoyable. If he is frank no, then all the delights of the Internet will be very difficult to learn. To choose the most acceptable option, you should make a full comparison of browsers. For we need the best of the best.

Most Popular Browsers

To date, there are several leaders in terms of Internet surfing. All of them differ among themselves in some parameters. In general, almost all modern browsers cope with their tasks, but among them there are the best.

Google Chrome

Extremely fast browser from a team of developers from Google. It differs by the built-in support of Flash-content and unrealistically high speed of work. However, it is also famous for its gluttony in terms of consumption of the device's RAM. In this case, there is no difference what: mobile or stationary.

Mozilla Firefox

Free browser with open source. It features unsurpassed safety. At least, according to the developers. Has an extensive base of all kinds of additions and extensions. Also does not load the computer at all. However, it is not at all friendly with Flash-content and the player from Adobe.

Opera

The former legend. Once it was based on its own web engine, but switched to Blink. After that, Opera's popularity plummeted, as it began to resemble all "chromo-like" browsers. Now the situation is corrected. The disadvantage of the "Opera" is only a very meager equipment with applications.

"Yandex browser"

It can be called popular only if you consider that users are trying to cram it with all the truths and crooks along with the installed programs. It's a clone of Google Chrome with Russian adaptation. Naturally, it has all the advantages and disadvantages of "Chrome".

Vivaldi

A new project designed to revive the classic "Opera". Since the final release was released recently, it is too early to talk about any interesting additions. But the speed of the browser is impressive. Probably, this browser will become the best soon.

Microsoft Edge

A standard browser in the operating system Windows 10. Came to replace the obsolete outcast Internet Explorer. Strangely enough, the company from Redmond turned out something similar to an adequate browser. However, there is no optimization, and there are no additions. But it works brightly.

And now we'll look at all these "handicrafts" in more detail, we'll compare the browsers and decide who is worthy to take the place of honor of the "Browser by default" on our computer.

Google Chrome. Give me the speed!

Perhaps the best browser of all. If you do not take into account the increased consumption of RAM. The comparison of browsers by the consumption of memory clearly shows that "Chrome" eats a lot. Even with one open tab. However, you can forgive him this sin, if you recall his many virtues.

The launch time of the browser is 1.5 seconds. About the loading time of the page is generally better to remain silent, because it is unrealistic to measure it. In the store "Chrome" there is a bunch of add-ons for all occasions. Plus - the flexibility of customization. The built-in Flash plug-in also costs a lot. In general, if you need a browser with all the working elements out of the box, then there is nothing better than Chrome.

Mozilla Firefox. Security Guru

"Ognelis" is an excellent choice for those who appreciate safe surfing. Also it is very convenient to use and has a huge database of add-ons for complete customization of its "for yourself." In the tests, he lags somewhat behind the "Chrome". But only in minor aspects. For example, it starts a little longer. And fanatical attachment to security made developers completely abandon the leaky Adobe Flash.

Otherwise, "Ogneliys" is an excellent browser that supports everything you need for comfortable work on the Internet. Separately, I would like to note that the browser is developed by the independent community of the Mozilla Foundation, which allows it to be used as a regular browser in free operating systems of the Linux family.

Opera. Return of the legend

After the transition of the "Opera" to the Blink engine, its popularity fell sharply. "Oldfagi" began to yell with one voice that "Opera" turns into "Chrome". But without new technologies, nowhere. The developers of Opera understood this and tried to make their browser as modern as possible at the expense of the classical canons. And they did it very well. The performance of the new "Opera" is at the level of Firefox and Chrome. And the browser looks like an ordinary Opera.

The only significant drawback of the "Opera" is the paucity of additions. Several utilities for blocking advertising - that's the whole arsenal. In terms of ease of use, "Opera" is clearly inferior to the above browsers. Yes, and customize it for yourself is very difficult. Comparing the performance of browsers convincingly proves that "Opera" is worthy to occupy an honorable third place in this competition.

"Yandex browser". Installed under the noise

The characteristics of this browser can be written off from the classic "Chrome". For this is the same program, but with Russian adaptation and search by default from "Yandex." Maybe someone might be interested in it, but most of the time it is installed by mistake, forgetting to uncheck the required item when installing some completely unrelated program. The introduction of this brainchild of "Yandex" in comparison of browsers is explained solely by its "chromaticity".

Perhaps, the browser would have become a bit popular, if not for the annoying and aggressive policy of Yandex to impose its brainchild. Many users are wildly annoyed when they try to shove a completely unnecessary program. That's why most people use Chrome. At the peak of "Yandex". And Yandex.Browser, by the way, has an excellent adapted search for the Russian segment of the Internet. It's an appendage to all the "chrome" pluses. This is "Yandex.Browser". Comparing it with other products does not make sense, because it is completely copied.

Vivaldi. Classics in a new wrapper

Against the backdrop of nostalgia for the classic Opera, the developers tried to create a new browser on the classical canons. What did they do? It's not quite clear yet. The final release was presented in October 2016. Naturally, there will be numerous patches in the updated assemblies. But while the quality of performance and speed pleasantly surprised. Comparison of browsers Windows convincingly proves that a beginner is worthy to take a prominent place among recognized masters of the genre.

The disadvantage of Vivaldi is yet only one - the scarcity in supplements. Of course, they are, but even with them the browser can not adequately work. However, it is not like the rest of Internet browsers. Comparison with full-fledged final releases of other products is somewhat dishonest, for it is a completely new and raw product. That's when it all works fine, then you can compare it with others.

Microsoft Edge. Second time on the same raker

First, a new browser from Microsoft is amazing with its updated appearance and speed of opening pages. But on closer examination you can see that it's all the same Explorer in a new wrapper and with some improvements. For example, he uses even more memory than the notorious "Chrome". And in terms of functionality, he lags behind even Vivaldi. You can congratulate the corporation from Redmond with another failure. Comparison of browsers this clearly shows.

If you look into the bowels of Edge, it becomes clear that he is not able to cope with Flash-animation and Java Script. How did he get on that list? All its popularity is built on the fact that it is a regular browser of the new operating system. Accordingly, all owners of this OS use it in order to download a more responsive browser. And they do not open it anymore. That's all his popularity. Reviewing performance tests is generally ridiculous, because Edge is trudging along at the very tail end. What can I say? "Microsoft" in its repertoire.

Browsers for mobile devices on Android

All of the above browsers also have a mobile version. In addition, perhaps, Vivaldi. But the developers will eventually eliminate this annoying misunderstanding. Comparison of browsers "Android" devices shows that here the priorities change somewhat. The palm of the championship goes to Firefox. It is distinguished by adequate display of pages, fast loading and the least amount of consumed RAM.

The "Chrome" has the same problem as on the PC. He's too gluttonous. And if the computer is not very noticeable, then for the mobile gadget, its appetite turns out to be critical. It loads unrealistically for a long time. Especially on devices that have very modest technical characteristics.

"Opera" is popular on mobile devices, so to speak, according to old memory. Once there were no special alternatives for smartphones in terms of the browser. All sat in the "Opera". But not only does the habit play a role here. A balanced combination of speed, appearance and optimization makes "Opera" the second most popular browser on "Android." Comparison of browsers "Android" devices would be incomplete without "Opera".

Browsers on Windows Phone

Owners of devices on iOS and WP also have an alternative. However, for the owners of "vindofonov" everything is much worse. The meager store of their system does not provide a special option. On Windows Mobile 10 , the mobile version of Edge is installed by default. As well as full, it is not worth it to use it. In the camp of the owners of "vindofonov" the most popular browser is "Opera". The choice and comparison of mobile browsers in this case does not work, because the WP platform has a very narrow assortment. Some can still install "Ognelisa", but its optimization on this mobile platform leaves much to be desired. Why is that? Maybe it's in the "Wind" itself. "Microsoft" is known for its glitches in mobile OS.

Browsers on iOS

"Apple" usually sit on the sink Safari. And this is completely justified, because the balance of speed and performance is exactly what it needs for iOS and the current device. Although some install and "Flamel", considering it much more convenient for Internet surfing on the "Apple." Notice, no "Chromov" and "Opera". "Apple" obviously know good in good browsers. Comparison of mobile browsers highlights one, the leader with a large margin - Mozilla Firefox. The best solution for a mobile device in terms of performance, appearance and comfort in management.

Conclusion

According to all the above, almost perfect browser for a personal computer - Google Chrome. It has the best balance of performance, appearance, ergonomics and functionality. It leads only to excessive gluttony in terms of RAM. But for modern PCs and laptops, this is not a problem.

In the mobile segment, everything is somewhat different. The Palm of the championship is won by the fast and secure Mozilla Firefox. Comparison of browsers showed that "Ogneliys" confidently bypassed all its competitors. And with an impressive margin. The balance of speed, safety and ergonomics turned out to be ideal. And its lack of demand for system resources allowed to launch even on low-power devices.

In general, the choice of the browser is a very individual matter. Use what you prefer. However, speed and safety also need to be paid attention. And may the Internet be with you.